pull down to refresh
110 sats \ 5 replies \ @oomahq 26 May \ on: Gresham's Law has nothing to do with Bitcoin bitcoin
Hans-Hermann Hoppe disagrees :) Excerpt from the Gresham's Law Wikipedia article that you linked:
Austrian economist Hans-Hermann Hoppe said that "so-called Gresham's law" only applies under certain conditions, largely a result of governmental interventionist policies. In his 2021 book, Economy, Society, and History Hoppe states:
Even though contemporary currencies are not backed by nor made of precious metals I can think of a similar real-life situation to the one you described in the blogpost: when one fiat currency pegs to another and then (hyper)inflates away (e.g. the Argentinian peso in 2001).
This has been nagging me for many years. I believe I've reasoned it through. Given Gresham's law, how can bitcoin dominate in the presence of inferior money?
Obviously there are many inferior forms of money, so what is meant by "bad money drives out good?" The paper below explains why bitcoin will eventually drive out fiat.
nostr:naddr1qqgxgwfj8pnxxwfn8ymnxd3hvvexvq3qc856kwjk524kef97hazw5e9jlkjq4333r6yxh2rtgefpd894ddpsxpqqqp65wzzmpg4
reply
True, but most countries in the world impose capital gains taxes and FIFO accounting in order to use and spend Bitcoin "legally", which is still a pretty onerous interventionist policy.
This combined with Bitcoin's intrinsically superior SoV properties is enough to drive it out of circulation almost completely.
Repealing CGT is mandatory for Bitcoin to thrive as MoE at scale. I visited Lugano last year and I was amazed at the number of businesses where I could pay with LN (even real state agencies advertised they accepted payment in BTC). Switzerland doesn't have CGT.
reply
reply