pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @klk OP 3 Jun \ parent \ on: Are you comfortable with Bitcoin's security model? AskSN
That's a weak argument. There are a lot of possible attacks. A double spend that only affects someone and benefits the miner wouldn't harm the network much. A government concentrating huge amounts of hashrate and only mining OFAC compliant transactions, and ignoring blocks from other miners, is another example. And those attacks can be performed without having any Bitcoin at all. So, no, “trust” is not a solid defense strategy.
Any "defense strategy" I've heard of is just central planning, which would be bitcoin's certain death. Sure bitcoin may fail, but we don't have to weaken it by micro managing miner revenue.
reply
I'm not saying otherwise.
There's a difference between acknowledging a possible problem and a call to action. The Bitcoin network is and will be secure in the medium term. And maybe this problem does not even happen in the future. But denying it (or at least the possibility of it) will not make it go away. I'd rather be aware and prepared.
reply