From a game theoretical perspective, it's advantageous for MAGA to turn off non-MAGA from Bitcoin for as long as possible. You want your allies to gain power and influence, not your enemies.

That said, it's unnecessary...

To push back on MAGA affinity at a retail level like this is a dead end because the anti-MAGA that falls for it would be viewing it from an identity and feels first framework, not a hard-money problem-solving framework, and therefore end up in scamcoins regardless of MAGA.

If an anti-MAGA hero were to emerge, and become vocally pro-Bitcoin, they wouldn't convert identity-first people not interested in Bitcoin's merits. Those people would simply slay that hero for stepping outside the groupthink.

Bitcoin-first yet anti-MAGA people will need a different angle to combat the MAGA with Bitcoin, one that isn't based on reason because you can't reason people out of a place they didn't reason themselves into. I don't know what that is or could look like, but my bias is that they're so naive that they'll only use Bitcoin once they've exhausted their tantrums and have little choice, inevitably bending-the-knee to "Bitcoin acceptance" in a poetic reckoning of "social justice".