66 sats \ 0 replies \ @mudbloodvonfrei 8h \ parent \ on: Musk Toying With Bitcoiners Again? bitcoin
Which is why I'm on SN and not X.
Honey badger don't care. Musk is the honey badger. He does and says what he wants to, because he doesn't need to care what anyone thinks of him. Good for him.
“Our constitution was made only for a moral and religious people. It is wholly inadequate to the government of any other.” - John Adams
What about keeping territories but putting them behind a paywall. As the internet becomes shittier by the day, I would be willing to shell out sats for access to a high quality knowledge base on a variety of topics.
I'd explain that some people are less fortunate and there is a moral obligation to help them. Doesn't have to be by giving money, could be a job, or food, etc. I'd also explain that this moral obligation doesn't grant the dude a corresponding right to my money, and that believing otherwise is a slippery slope to communism.
I come to stacker news to escape the enshittified web, but I think the beautiful thing about SN is that instead of hard rules, people vote with their sats. On the other hand, the current cost of posting probably isn't high enough to prevent enshittification here if someone were really determined to ruin SN.
"Not taking out as much debt as possible when rates were zero" - a very good point. I'm allergic to debt but yeah I should have done that.
Exactly. Bitcoin's decentralized and immutable nature is very useful for money but not for real estate, stocks etc because your need for protection of property rights over the latter is much greater than with bitcoin, which means you're going to be subject to some sort of legal system.
I haven't been to a bookstore in years but I used to enjoy them a lot. I read a while back that BN got a new CEO who really gets it and turned the place around.
I guess the ultimate goal is to get everyone to care about privacy. Once you make it the norm, you don't stand out.