pull down to refresh
@rblb
46,146 sats stacked
stacking since: #352021longest cowboy streak: 3 verified stacker.news contributornpub1klt4m...pcysd4kr0priccardobl
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @rblb 17 Jan \ on: Nintendo Switch 2 to be released in 2025 gaming
the joycon connector looks like planned obsolescence.
I did the math and it is pretty much what we are supposed to pay in italy, except that we have ways to legally trick it.
Eg. if you use the right combination of taxcode and profession, the state will require you to not pay taxes on a % of your income due to it being considered expenses, while your actual expenses are much lower, giving you a defacto taxcut. This is 100% legal, the catch is that you need to have some favorable conditions to benefit from it and close but not more than 85k yr income (the closer you get to the limit the more favorable it is).
If you don't have a way to do this in spain, things look very bad.
Please Darth stop ruining the magic. Let's just pretend things just work until they don't 🗿
Also, realistically you would need a ton of spam to trigger rate limit with nwc.
As a dev who rejects modernity and embrace tradition, this is my string based approach
public boolean isPalindrome(int x) { String s = "" + x; int l = s.length(); for(int i = 0;i < l;i++){ int j = l-1-i; if (s.charAt(i)!=s.charAt(j)) return false; } return true; }
and integer based approach
private int reverse(int n){ int r = 0; while(n != 0) { int d = n % 10; r = r * 10 + d; n = n / 10; } return r; } public boolean isPalindrome(int x) { if(x<0)return false; return reverse(x)==x; }
To add on this, i've tried also cursor (thanks to @k00b), that is nice but I’ve noticed it is somewhat more opinionated about code compared to copilot.
In my experience, copilot feels like it is following you and just completing the code, while cursor feels like it is trying to anticipate what you will want to do several steps ahead. I prefer copilot, but I think it is a matter of personal taste and coding style.
I've been trying Github copilot reviews, that is another beta service, but it doesn't work very well , at least with our code base, but it can catch some oversights, sometimes.
Thank you, I'm glad you liked the result!
@k00b already compensates me generously, so i think a better use for those sats would be to put them on an invite link to onboard newbs.
But if you have more feature requests in mind, feel free to open issues, I am not working directly on the p2p (ex-nov-5) update, so I'll have time to look into them🫡
236 sats \ 0 replies \ @rblb 29 Nov 2024 \ parent \ on: Early object oriented programming languages devs
With good OOP you shouldn't even have to read the actual code 90% of the time, just the abstractions (unless you are bugfixing it).
But an OOP language to be good it needs to be very strict and verbose.
Java imo is (was) the best OOP language, C++ being the worst.
That would be around 100 sats in fee per zap.
So, small zaps are not feasible with a liquid wallet, it could still have its use as fallback for larger transactions though (like paying for a territory, or receiving rewards maybe).
Sorry for that, i think you already saw that the agent was moved back to your account yesterday 🫡
Thank you, it seems the issue was related to improper url encoding for some files on our parser node. Should be fixed now, please try it again and let me know, and sorry for the inconvenience.
Fell free to add it to your agent i will try to debug it from there, currently this agent doesn't show to have any file attached
Hello, I'm a dev at openagents.
There was a bug yesterday that might have caused this issue. Could you please try again? And if it still fails, please give me with the agent's name, and I will investigate further from here.
Also, please note that if you provide a website domain without a page (eg. https://example.com instead of https://example.com/index.html), it will try to pull the entire website if it has a valid sitemap, this might take up to 20 minutes depending on the size of the website.
🫡