324 stacked

It seems that this is just the outline. The actual book isn't out yet.

I don't know what this is. It looked like fake news spam that redirected to an advertisement. Posts like this should be removed either by moderation or downvoting.

There should be a way to flag posts like this.

Where are all the research papers in favor of PoW? There are lots for different PoS systems. Why is no one debunking Ouroboros[0]? There is one paper by A. Poelstra[1], but it's old and not getting enough attention.

In my opinion, these random comments and blog posts in favor of PoW aren't really cutting it. If the scientific community favors PoS, it will start affecting policy decisions, and when the ball starts rolling it's difficult to stop. Stronger arguments are needed to stop this madness.

[0] https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-63688-7_12 [1] https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/Distributed-Consensus-from-Proof-of-Stake-is-Poelstra/9d1cb62f7fde9b03882567ee01adba31b7108276#citing-papers

I just say that Bitcoin is better money and it's inevitable that better money replaces the worse. Although people usually just want to get rich, so convincing them that it's going up is enough.

The article is not actually published in the journal. This is just an abstract that makes some claims. The author is apparently a known scammer: https://www.gripeo.com/dr-steven-gundry/

People are selling dollars for bitcoin. Selling makes the price go down.

Although, globally people are fleeing from their local currency to USD (or USDT etc.), which slows down USD inflation despite of money printing. Stablecoins increase the market for dollars considerably, and we'll probably see stable-dollar take over most of the fiat world in the coming years.

What is Etleneum exactly? Everything runs on Etleneum server?

I don't get it. What is this voucher you can buy?

Zero chance. I see Ethereum losing its second position, and soon it'll be lost in the sea of shitcoins, all of them trending towards zero against bitcoin.

Well, one specific issue is the "loading screen" on page loads which happens because content is rendered client-side. It's not a huge issue but kind of annoying.

Growth hacks might result in lower quality of users. I don't really think that SN needs more features right now, and generally the focus should be on UX & performance. Quality content + users is what matters. I check SN every day, so from my perspective it should be sticky enough for organic growth.

This is actually repost. I can't delete this however.

No, it's not a good idea to steal content from different places. This will grow organically.