Here's an example: https://erichartford.com/based-30b

I don't think so. You would stay humble and stack sats.

Because why shill for a centralized platform?

I think research was easier back then. The whitepaper is all you need really and the bitcoin wiki is great. Nowadays there is information overload, much more buzzwords, scamcoins and false information. But then again 4 years is a very short timeframe IMHO. What if it were 15 minutes? Would you call it instamine? Where would you draw the line? I think DOGE and XMR are scamcoins for this very reason: they have a very sharp coinbase decline shortly after genesis, benefitting early miners disproportionately.

I've always believed that halvings were unfair. And I say this as an OG who reaped significant benefits. I don't deserve massive gains just for being born a bit earlier. I use Bitcoin to opt-out of the system, not to get rich. 50% of total supply mined in the first 4 years doesn't seem fair For Dogecoin and Monero the numbers are even sharper: 80% of total supply mined in the first 4 years 50% of total supply mined in the first year

Try Flowblade

..then synchronize it with ࿕oogle Photos 🤡

This is not an exaggeration. You can find many reports of independent open source developers having their apps randomly flagged for no coherent reason. Here are some examples: https://frozenfractal.com/blog/2024/9/6/why-my-apps-will-soon-be-gone-from-google-play/ Conversations Quicksy iA Writer Fairemail Syncthing And lastly this gem: XScreensaver

Taproot is better for privacy.

You could just use the good old GPG.

Your definition of success/failure is very lame. Regardless of price bitcoin has been running with 100% uptime. Tick, tock. Next block.

This is nothing new really. It's called the evil-twin attack and it's independent of the wireless security used as it's a user vulnerability (phishing). You can try a demo here.

You could at least remove the UTM tracking parameters before sharing.