0 sats \ 1 reply \ @AGORA 7 May \ on: SN release: hash emails, detail on nym hover, CLN over tor, bottom nav, and more meta
That's great! Loving the hover effect. It will be nice to also see if the user has any other public profile available (i.e. nostr or github or if is a dev contributor) with the relative icon near the username/cowbow.
For felipe could be like this
Oh another thing! I'm glad that autowitdraw nodes using CLN can now connect via TOR. Any plan to enable the same feature for LND nodes? I'm getting an error when trying
Hey @needcreations_ thank you for posting your Ad here in the ~AGORA. It has now been pinned to thank you for your contribution to the territory. Hope it brought you much business. It will be nice to know :)
We do have the technology, and isn't about the ~AGORA territory. More like enabling this P2P free market many talk about but not many are able to understand and operate with. Look like we lack awareness on how we could operate freely, without extra bullshit.
For example, if I say we should do business without registering a company. How many have the balls to do it and enable a free market?
How many are already doing it?
2044 sats \ 2 replies \ @AGORA 25 Mar \ parent \ on: Why should someone own a territory? alter_native
yes correct. Take ~builders. it's a place for an existing community using the territory as an alternative to... let's say slack or discord.
I think the most important is to engage with the community or create one. We'll hopefully have soon some functionality to allow people to zap or chip in territories, or also multy-ownership will be a great thing to have. You cannot do it alone, in the meantime, invite people to join you, create contents in your territory and interact with it actively! That's my advice and approach
This is great, thanks for diving in and come up with these ideas. I don't think the use of Ai is required, especially in a p2p marketplace where trust is indirectly built over reputation and proof of work.
I'd add here that we work in the open, we build in public and the work someone did for a specific peer, could also be useful to others and the others, if in good fate, could also reward the creator and chip in with more zaps.
A great example I've seen of this is the Biz podcast that features John Carvalho (@BitcoinErrorLog) interviewing Bitcoin professionals about their valuable experiences as founders, product designers, lawyers, and entrepreneurs building the Bitcoin products of tomorrow.
With his crowdwall model, similar to traditional paywalls John aimed for a min amount of sats to be accumulated by one or more participants, and when the amount is reached, the item is released to the public. The first zapping win the advantage of getting the know-how before everyone else. It will be cool to see something similar here on @SN.
I've also seen another great example of collaborative task resolution in the ~design territory, where @itsTomekK recently had a PHOTOSHOP REQUEST. The bounty in this case has not been released thought SN "pay bounty" button, but you'll notice he fairly distributed the amount in the comments, splitting it across the submissions he found valuable.
It will be interesting to see the ~AGORA hosting this kind of requests, it will be fun to watch how everything will evolve.
Thanks for your contribution, it's much appreciated as it allows us to explore other possibilities.
Nice, spicy item! Do you offer international shipping? What about batch prices? Special deal fro stackers? Ok I stop... too many questions! It look's delicious!
G'morning stackers... #465747 in case you missed this poll
Nice to see these here! We also have a similar weekly post in the ~AGORA
I damn agree! @k00b when the "Share to Nostr" (as a kind 1) button?
Oh I agree! It's so early, we can feel lonely some time! I've been wondering about bringing new folks to SN and sharing on nostr it's kind of slowly working! How are you planning to ... bring a diverse set of folks to SN?
Firstly
In the name of Kronk, ahahah! You make my day with this! Anyway, I knew someone could fill triggered by these words, and that's why I put it in that way. Ordinals obviously are just an option, I did not say is the ideal one, not Ii think is the most sustainable. Your nostr image host solution could be much more efficient and useful. BTW I don't see why @SN should not implement it... or maybe is already there?
Secondly
You are right on this too, I probably forgot to mention the built-in multisig functionality that can definitely be used for each transaction in steps (1) and (2). My mention to covenants was explicitly to automate somehow the payments a long time, in this case on a weekly basis mentioned in step (3). What I'm assuming is that covenants interact on signed on-chain transactions and support it until the variables are filled.
Lastly
You are totally right. The "trustless" was obviously referring to the whole process of creating an Ad here on SN, and don't trust any third party to have the deal done. This excluding point (7). It wanted to be just an option and could be easily excluded from the process.
I'm not setting here the standing stones of the process, just an idea to build on and exchange opinions to make it available somehow. True is, I mixed many things together without knowing the working details of them, including the covenants.
Summarizing
- Ad-post created on SN together with an open agreement as onchain transaction signed by the creator (the owner in this case).
- The other parties validate information and its interest, signing the agreement
- Covenant is responsible to deliver the funds as established in the agreement (on a weekly basis for the next two months)
- This could be done before step (2) and at the end of the lease with ordinals or nostr-image-host or any other solution able to host images in a decentralized manned with timestamp and other relative metadata
- In case of any issue, a new agreement might need to be stipulated, so this will be a new multisig process linked to the original one but not able to break it.
- in the best case scenario, when everything goes well: owner receive the full amount initially agreed.
- This is a fully optional step, and if both parties do not find an agreement, I assume the first agreement will continue going until competition. If there's a disagreement, both parties should initiative a new dispute (contract), but this as well will be not affecting the original one.
Many of us probably are thinking: in two years, the value of bitcoin will be changing a lot! That's your problem, because you're still thinking on fiat terms. Fiat change value too.