0 sats \ 0 replies \ @B_rian 21 Oct \ on: Billionaire Ripple founder has given more than $11.8 million to Harris campaign Politics_And_Law
deleted by author
Nostr is a tremendous coordination layer for bitcoin based digital economies. If he truly believed what he was saying, he would live those values.
Because Parker doesn't use nostr and chooses X for reach instead, I conclude that his essays/books are tools to promote his business interests at Zaprite and not the general growth of bitcoin value.
But bitcoin cares not what he or I thinks. It continues without consent and resists any form of guidance.
Biggest liability I see is DMCA requests. So relays need a takedown request mechanism for DMCA requests.
This could be pretty straightforward with authorized keys who can send DMCA notices or a DMCA webform on the relay homepage.
But at least relays can't accidentally cache/store CP. I'm thinking of implementing an AI nudity filter for my next relay. I don't want to distribute CP.
What concerns me is misinformation laws. It is much harder to systematically screen for ideas and doing so undermines nostr ethos.
Parker spends a lot of time explaining what other people should do but he does so in the permissioned hellscape of X.
An open, permissionless protocol is used for whatever people want to use it for. There are 2.1 quadrillion sats. Their use will always be determined by the sender and receiver. HODL or don't, bitcoin's use case will always be fluid and determined by UTXO private key holders.
If Parker truly believed in Bitcoin as money, he would be driving V4V on the nostr and not cucking to Elon on X. He chooses X over nostr because of engagement, because he needs to farm and monetize his audience. Don't be food for cucks.
I am confused. Most nostr relays don't host any media. They might have a link to digital content but no content is hosted. Notes are plain text. Is it illegal to have a link to illegal content?
GENESIS