It's easy for BCH to have low fees when nobody uses it.

everyone could be a donor

Lol, no. This is completely untrue, sorry.

Hm... What? Maybe try again?

Yes, exactly. The point here is not "bitcoin sucks becaus quantum will break it". The point is "Take this seriously and start working on post quantum addresses now".

All these examples can be very quickly uodated to quantum resistant cryptography. Most of them quite easily.
Bitcoin will first need to develop quantium resistant addresses and then all the people need to move their coins to the new addresses. This may take years and should be completed before quantium computers are powerful enough to break bitcoin cryptography.

Work on post quantium addresses in bitcoin should be now, not after quantium computers are strong enough.

Yeah, that is true. Obviously if the shorter chain is to actually succeed it needs some hashing power that won't make the block interval too large like a day or more...

Lol, I have forgotten that I have asked the exact same question and it has been answered. Sorry.

What they are saying is only true if the RDTS fork eventually gets and maintains more hash rate than the non RDTS hashrate.

This is not exactly true. If the minority nodes are the actual economic actors, they simply won't accept coins from the other chain, even if it is longer. This will be the case if the nodes on the chain without bip110 don't use bitcoin as money.

I think I will close my channels before the transition and wait to see what will happen...

Yeah, that's true. Actually where I live checks were never used. I am not actually sure how they work/worked. You get a notebook from the bank, tear a page, write a payment amount on it and give it to the person you are paying to? Then he goes with this paper to the bank and they exchange it for money? Was this the system?

Are you still using paper checks to pay your groceries

Most people use paper cash actually.

Hm... I don't really find it boring.

No. I'll discuss it with your sister.

I want people to discuss bip110 here. That would make it interesting.

Does the receiver or the sender determine the mint?
Also the fact that lightning isn't used directly sucks.

I will continue to use it, since we don't seem don't have a term for it.

If you call both of them "a node" you are failing to distinguish them. That's why I am looking for a term that specifically describes the node from the first case in my previous reply.
So what would be the appropriate term for it (equivalent to what I, maybe incorrectly, called a "routing node")?

What is the correct term to differentiate nodes that have payments that don't originate or terminate on them, but are passed through them from nodes that don't have such payments?

Am I using a wrong word here? What is the correct term for a non-edge node that routes payments through it?