pull down to refresh
BIP 110 compatible blocks are compatible with the current consensus rules. BIP 110 narrows the rules, instead if expanding them. That, by definition makes it a soft fork, not a hard fork the anonymous poster claims.
This is more of a design question then current usage question.
No... Waiting for payments to accumulate and then changing the receive address.
What kind of troubles have you had with DHT? I just tested it with a completely new torrent and a magnet link (and yes, no trackers) and my friend downloaded it successfully. Single seeder on the planet (me) found by a single leacher on the planet (my friend).
I have used bittorrent to share files with friends. Manually created torrent. No trackers. Works. What client are you using?
DHT is genious way to make truly decentralized, infinitely scalable and most importantly, extremely efficient index. Very rarely someone finds genious solutions like this.
Yes, exactly. The point here is not "bitcoin sucks becaus quantum will break it". The point is "Take this seriously and start working on post quantum addresses now".
All these examples can be very quickly uodated to quantum resistant cryptography. Most of them quite easily.
Bitcoin will first need to develop quantium resistant addresses and then all the people need to move their coins to the new addresses. This may take years and should be completed before quantium computers are powerful enough to break bitcoin cryptography.
Work on post quantium addresses in bitcoin should be now, not after quantium computers are strong enough.
Terminology is extremely important if you want to have meaningful communication.