Zeus is buggy as hell. Is think they should implement some software version of double entry accounting in the app.

Why doesn't someone fork knots and just remove bip110 code from it? I propose the name of the fork be bitcoin bowline.

Unknown

I don't think this is the case. Individual miners in Ocean using DATUM can construct blocks with lower transaction fees if they want.

Maybe ocean should support only datum and remove the stratum endpoint.

I see Ocean blocks don't include transactions with fees below 1.

Automatic payments are a great way to lose track of my money. I avoid them in fiat world also.

Why is this actually needed? As far as I know with DATUM you build your own block, which means that you explixitly chose which fork you put your block on. Isn't using DATUM the point of actually mining with Ocean?

Well, what did you mean when you wrote the post?

How does lightning support streaming payments?

Yeah, /dev/random is enough. Using hardware rnd is enough. Using insecure pseudorandom generator or cryptographycaly secure, but predictably seeded pseudorandom number generator is not.

Satoshi's wallet doesn't have a seed.

When you say NEVER (in CAPS), you don't litterally mean literally never spend from the vault, right?

Actually all vulnerabilities are a human error. That doesn't prevent them from existing. And theoretically if a system is built without any error, no hacker can attack it.

dS = dQ/T

Have you actually tried sending less than 1 sat via ln? I tried and it doesn't work.

What is this bullshit site design where scrolling vertically scrolls a portion of the page horizontally 🤦‍♂️

I am more interested in whether there is a correlation between the times someone had a consensual sex last month and whether he/she supports/is against/doesn't care about bip 110

?

Ecause of missing feature in lightning it is not possible to pass a whole utxo through lightning. Your channel will always have a reserve that will stay linked to you when you close a lightning channel.

I think somebody needs to sandardise simultaneous send all and close of a channel. It is technically possible.

Tier 3 isps buy connectivity from other ISPs. Tier 2 ISPs buy for connectivity to some part of the internet, the rest they access by peering agreement with another ISPs (that's they agree to accept traffic with each other as long as the destination is either their own network or a network of a paying client (another ISP)). Tier 1 ISPs have peering agreements with other ISPs so that they can send traffic to the whole of internet just via the peering. They also have very large networks to begin with.

It's interesting that connectivity is mutual, but the payment has a direction (usually from the smaller to the bigger player).