pull down to refresh
53 sats \ 0 replies \ @C_Otto OP 15 Feb \ on: Bank transfer in Germany cannot be reversed bitcoin
German: https://www.tagesschau.de/wirtschaft/verbraucher/iban-finanzamt-rueckzahlung-100.html
I can recommend paragliding in Miraflores, over the cliff. And Ollantaytambo was also worth the time!
Forwarded 173,000 transactions on the lightning network, saving quite a bit of blockspace in the process.
EDIT: Oh, and as in the years before, I run a top rated full node: https://bitnodes.io/nodes/leaderboard/?q=rwth
Aside from B12, I don't think it's difficult at all. You might want to try it yourself, there's not a whole lot to think about.
64 sats \ 0 replies \ @C_Otto OP 3 Oct 2024 \ parent \ on: My inbound fee policy for c-otto.de lightning
No, that way you'd earn less instead of more.
Regarding the lightning territory: #536186
I have around 15 BTC on my local side, but still face the same issue. Having a bit more remote balance is fine, but I still prefer to cut off channels that don't perform. There's still the struggle of having outbound liquidity where I want it to have, and it's far from perfect. For me or means having a bit of channel churn and, sadly, some routing failures.
Maybe it's worth it to look at broader trends and statistics? The price you're paying includes labor, infrastructure, tax, and possibly investments into new (renewable) power plants. Inflation also plays a role here.
Here's a nice trend showing how the price of solar power decreased over time:
The money could be used to invest into public transport. There's very little need for innovation in that sector. Just build more trains/tracks, provide more buses, ... Additionally, you could invest into making cities more walkable, and provide better/safer bicycle paths. To the best of my knowledge, walking/cycling/taking the bus is much cheaper than taking a car.
We already have way too many cars, EV or not. And reducing CO2 emissions is absolutely necessary, putting a cost on CO2 is something I applaud!