💯

AI’s role in creative fields definitely stirs up a lot of fear, especially when it comes to job security, but I think the deeper worry is about losing the meaning behind our work. It’s not just about the task itself, but the feeling of creating something, of expressing yourself, and the connections that come with it. The problem with a lot of critiques of AI is they focus on the surface, whether AI can do the job well today, when really, the question should be about the bigger picture: how do we find value in things beyond the paycheck? Work should be about more than just economic output. It’s about finding joy in the act of creating and feeling connected to something meaningful.

The thing is, these concerns often stem from a place of wanting to protect a system we’ve built. But jobs are never as stable as they seem, and we should be thinking more about how we can reshape these systems to support people’s emotional and social needs, not just their economic ones. Ultimately, it’s not about whether AI takes over certain roles, but how we redefine success and fulfillment in a world where technology is constantly evolving. If we can focus on creating spaces for people to adapt, express themselves, and find real value in their work, then we’re on the right track.

Confidence really is something you build over time, not just a magic switch. It’s about showing up consistently, even when it’s tough. Thanks for sharing this piece. Self-mastery is a journey, and this is a great reminder that confidence grows through practice, not perfection!

That’s a great question and one that doesn’t have an easy answer. I think it’s both, and the balance between the two really shapes how a society functions.

The law sets the framework, but it’s the people who give it life (or push back when it fails). You can have the best laws on paper, but if the people don’t uphold them or if the culture doesn’t value them, they don’t mean much. On the flip side, a strong and principled group of people can sometimes rise above bad laws and demand change.

It’s a dynamic relationship. Laws influence people, but people also shape the laws. Definitely something worth thinking about more.

This is such a solid breakdown of how Bitcoin actually reflects real productivity, not the lack of it. A lot of critics miss the deeper point. Bitcoin doesn’t just show up out of nowhere. You earn it by putting in work, creating value, and being productive in the real world.

I really like how you connected productivity with education (learning to harness energy), infrastructure (putting that energy to use), and technology (amplifying both). Bitcoin sits right in the middle of all that—it rewards people who build, adapt, and innovate.

The contrast you made at the end is perfect too. Instead of relying on top-down slogans like tariffs or currency manipulation, Bitcoin pushes us to focus on actual progress and real value creation. It’s not about quick fixes, it’s about doing the work. Well said.

This week, I’ve been brainstorming ways to make Nostr more engaging for creators and the community. Thinking about how to build fun, competitive events, kind of like #zapathon, but with new twists. Also exploring ways to help creators showcase sneak peeks of their work and get zaps for it.

What’s your take on Nostr and integrating Boltz with it in some way?

💯

Either I blew her mind all day or she’s was completely oblivious of what just happened.