Thanks for letting us know! The website seems to be working for others. Could you try the following steps? 1.Clear your browser cache or try a different browser. 2.Check your internet connection or switch to a different network. 3.Try accessing the site from another device.

Is the webpage not displaying, or are you unable to submit the signature?

Definitely:)

Nope, they can participate too.

I thought the goal of Bitcoin was to become a peer-to-peer electronic cash system

We are calculating the total amount of Bitcoin.

Definitely better than war.

There’s no need to burn or spend Bitcoin in this project. It simply uses the user’s Bitcoin address and signature to verify the endorsement, and the Bitcoin remains 100% in the user’s own address

Thank you for your interest in this project.

I recommend checking out the About page on our website: https://koinvote.com/en/about

If you’d like to dive deeper into our vision and objectives, feel free to check out our thread on X (formerly Twitter): https://x.com/koinvote/status/1850749830491980096?s=46&t=Fs4HDyLcpVcIkwheq

The essence of domestic elections is to prevent civil war. If international elections were possible, it might provide an opportunity to achieve world peace.

Signing a text message doesn’t expose your public key.

To endorse your candidate by proving your Bitcoin holdings with a Bitcoin signature. Your Bitcoin address is needed to verify the signature.

How to Sign Message in Bitcoin Electrum: https://www.altcointrading.net/howto/sign-verify-message/#how-to-sign-a-message-in-electrum

If you're using a cold wallet, most of them provide their own signature guides.

Trezor: 
https://trezor.io/learn/a/sign-verify?srsltid=AfmBOoqosBaEMg__ltExJv6U46MPlMoeCdb4DCXQe_O6het3Bo2QDBOH



Coldcard:
 https://coldcard.com/docs/sign-text-file/

Ledger: https://support.ledger.com/article/16056574709021-zd

Update: A total of 4.85498185 BTC is currently participating in endorsements.

Could you elaborate on what you mean by ‘oxymoron’? I’d like to understand better

Thank you for your insight. My view is that the issues you mentioned stem from traditional voting systems, not Bitcoin voting. If Bitcoin successfully becomes a form of political power, power groups would need to buy Bitcoin to support themselves. This means more funds would flow into Bitcoin instead of fueling wars, making wars too costly. After all, wars cannot seize Bitcoin, which changes the dynamics of power and reduces the incentives for conflict

Could you please elaborate? I don’t quite understand what you mean