Thanks buddy! I'll contact @jerry, it looks like we have the same project.

If you need any help in your project, I'd love if I could help! I am writing an article on the historical moments of Bitcoin for a little while now, I have gathered a lot of data and sources. I would be happy to share it with you.

Thank you! Initially, I didn't want to include any other BIPs besides BIP1 to highlight the emergence of the BIP system. But after thinking about it, it's true that BIP39 as well as the BIPs dedicated to mnemonics and derivation have disrupted the ecosystem. Do you have a link and/or date for the day when Bitcoin was first mentioned?

Take a look at the objections section of the BIP: https://github.com/casey/ord/blob/master/bip.mediawiki I'd say that it effectively decrease the fungibility of sats, but it is one of the many way we could number the sats. And numbering the sats was possible since the beginning of the network. So it's not a real concern to me.

We need useful things while it's still cheap to write on-chain data.

Even if all messaging systems worked with PoW antispam. Bitcoin would still be considered boiling the oceans.