One of the major problems in my opinion of ghostguns is the access to files. Some countries are very good at censoring these files, and while I know that nothing is ever really deleted from the internet, everything remains accessible, it seems to me that the priority is to make these files as accessible as possible to those who need them. Ordinals Inscriptions currently allow writing data up to 4MB in the most redundant and censorship resistant registry that exists today.
For the benefit of all, and if you can afford it, please consider the option of registering these files in that registry.
Thank you ❤️
better than jpegs at least.
reply
I guess its a "better" use case for eating up that block space than silly jpegs, I wonder if there will even be a market for these transactions after the hype dies down, if no wallets are supporting it, why would people bother? I just think this will be an out of sight out of mind thing
reply
Wikileaks step over, Ordinals is in town. Will be a powerful (though mostly annoying) tech. Right now there's some bad AI art, some weird vector lines, some stupid trading cards...but the genius troll of putting eth rocks on haha
reply
am i the only one thinking being able to identify each and every sat is a bad thing? i know im late to the party but am i missing something?
reply
Take a look at the objections section of the BIP: https://github.com/casey/ord/blob/master/bip.mediawiki I'd say that it effectively decrease the fungibility of sats, but it is one of the many way we could number the sats. And numbering the sats was possible since the beginning of the network. So it's not a real concern to me.
reply
We need useful things while it's still cheap to write on-chain data.
reply
The good thing about silly things is they prompt people to think: "I can do so much better. I'll fix it." And then they create google or apple... or bitcoin : )
As the American philosopher noted: "God blessed the broken road that led me straight to you"
reply