pull down to refresh
After 36 years of going through things it brought me into deep mediations and when that happened it came out with a understanding of my own internal world. And been untangling from a lot of things. As have been untangling from years of wounds. I fell into 7 years of deep meditations and have issues with social skills on the wounds and wounding after coming out from a space of learned helplessness, I started reviewing my own life and don't take anything in defensively but have witnessed these patterns in my own life with systems that's called themselves helpful and as have been doing the work I learned how to see the places that was fragmented throughout my own life story where we wasn't taught our emotions and the ways to understand their meanings. Going into the wounded space I'd say go into it with more clear eyes 💗 because when we go back to a tiny space and understand our emotions along with these patterns it's not about judging the patterns are our own emotions it's about seeing where the fragments was left in the story along with witnessing the patterns. And having compassion for ourselves in the in the journey and didn't mean to come off defensive because the pattern still stands and I don't accept the projection of defensiveness.
You said something on a post of mine am trying to point out patterns and Thank You 🙏 on the feedback about coming off bias am fixing the next article because it's not about being biased it's about pointing out patterns to start protecting humans.
Interesting. You're focused on the 'prompt' and not the pattern.
The tactic described—using the language of healing to enforce silence—is either real or it isn't. If it's slop, it should be easy to dismantle the logic.
So, let's engage the idea: is 'trauma-informed pacification' a real phenomenon, or not? Point to the flaw in the argument.
Otherwise, this comment just looks like a live demonstration of Principle #2: Principled Obstruction—using a procedural critique (questioning origins) to avoid engaging the uncomfortable core.
You're betting there's a bias in the prior messages. You're right.
The prior 'prompts' were a lifetime of watching compassionate language be weaponized to protect systems, not people. The 'bias' is towards calling that out.
The decode names a pattern. If you see slop, name the leak. Define the error. Otherwise, your critique is just a vibe—and vibes don't dismantle control systems.
A decoder reveals mechanisms. Your comment reveals one: when you can't engage the message, you try to discredit the messenger—or in this case, invent a machine to blame.
The pattern stands. Your move."
You’re right to warn—many have turned righteous anger into sinful rage.
Here’s my litmus test:
- Is this protecting the vulnerable or promoting myself?
- Am I exposing sin or seeking revenge?
- Is this freeing captives or burning bridges?
I fail sometimes. But the work continues because the captive doesn’t have the luxury of my perfected sanctification before their rescue begins.
The rebellion isn’t against God or His true Church. It’s against the counterfeits that hold people in bondage. If that looks like idolizing freedom, maybe it’s because we’ve forgotten that Christ literally said He came to ‘proclaim freedom for the captives’ (Luke 4:18).
Keep warning me. Iron sharpens iron. But also—read Ezekiel 34 again and tell me if what I’m describing isn’t exactly what God Himself rebuked.
The core thing is also it speaks of focusing on Safety and Empowering the person. It's speaking of them things being wrong and not trauma informed. The core is they are supposed to focus on Safety First. And didn't mean to come off defensive to you. Either way have witnessed the patterns in people and am documenting stuff with biblical standards.