pull down to refresh
@benthecarman
746,282 sats stacked
stacking since: #4964longest cowboy streak: 182 verified stacker.news contributor
131 sats \ 0 replies \ @benthecarman 22 Apr \ parent \ on: @benthecarman joins Spiral bitcoin
I check it everyday!
When I joined TW I was going to do op cat research and we did a lot of cool stuff. However at the beginning of this year company started "temporarily" working on nft stuff and I eventually got tired of it and started looking elsewhere
It's just a simple dlc oracle. The project is like 5 years old at this point though, I doubt it works at all anymore
It's a measure of how hot it is outside from 0-100, Celsius is how hot water is from 0-100. Fahrenheit is a more human scale
Are you happy with CLN adoption. It is one of the lesser used implementations, I can see that as either being a positive or negative to you. Curious on your thoughts
What are you using for serving your website. I use nginx so I do certbot --nginx and then run certbot renew every so often
The rich are always hated. Tbh I don't see bitcoiners hated as much because all we did is talk about it
Saying we don't need covenants because we can do them on a layer 2 is a gross misunderstanding of the entire point of covenants.
Covenants main benefit (in my opinion) is to enable multi party protocols / layer 2s. Without them we can only build 2 party protocols (lightning) without putting huge complexity and availability requirements that defeat the whole purpose.
This argument comes from the block size wars where it actually made sense, we don't want every transaction to happen on-chain, we want them on higher layers. Advocating for covenants is actually a continuation of this, we don't want to do an on-chain transaction to on-board every user onto bitcoin, ideally we can group hundreds to thousands of users into a single utxo and have them be onboarded in an infinitely cheaper way.
We can't do covenant functionality on a higher layer because we need covenants to be able to build the higher layers.