pull down to refresh

@bitcoingraffiti
81,673 sats stacked
stacking since: #4929longest cowboy streak: 87
bio
657 items
by
for
40 sats \ 1 reply \ @bitcoingraffiti 3h \ on: Wife Logic lol
You are very lucky, ser. She values truth, reliability, and predictability. This is very good fortune. I commend you on your marital choice.
239 sats \ 1 reply \ @bitcoingraffiti 9h \ parent \ on: 5G Chipmaker Sequans (SQNS) Joins the Bitcoin Treasury Strategy Rush Stacker_Stocks
And did you buy in the end @BlokchainB? Great trade so far. I bought 100 shares initially and earlier today 125 more. I'm very happy. Not that it affects my portfolio or anything, but it's always fun to have these side bets.
I'll hold it for a while, though it will depend if they'll make future purchases.
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @bitcoingraffiti OP 23h \ parent \ on: IT'S THE ROARING 20s, BABY!!! art
If you don't have anything nice to say, just go somewhere else. Don't waste my time with your dark tinted world view.
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @bitcoingraffiti 9 Jul \ parent \ on: Profiles of STRK, STRF and STRD Stacker_Stocks
Ok, it's a good experiment. But prefs should underperform the common stock. (maybe not if bought under par) Otherwise Saylor's scheme wouldn't work, and there wouldn't be value creation, i.e. the bitcoin yield would be negative.
In his view the creditor is the sucker, and Bitcoin/common stock the superior asset.
11 sats \ 4 replies \ @bitcoingraffiti 9 Jul \ on: Profiles of STRK, STRF and STRD Stacker_Stocks
The retail investor should just buy $MSTR.
Those prefs and converts only work by the grace of Bitcoin going up more, i.e. making the common stock go up (and outperforming the derivatives).
Those prefs are mostly for institutions with a mandate, and you're gonna lose relative to $MSTR.
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @bitcoingraffiti 8 Jul \ parent \ on: Meme Monday - Best Bitcoin Meme Gets 5,000 CCs memes
Thanks you bastards, the cowboy credit ratio on this post was extra bad.
17 sats \ 1 reply \ @bitcoingraffiti 8 Jul \ on: Metaplanet Plots Acquisition Spree (Financial Times, Philip Stafford) econ
The FT is total garbage cover to back.
Stop reading that shit.
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @bitcoingraffiti 7 Jul \ parent \ on: This Day on SN: July 7 meta
Alright, didn't know, thanks.
32 sats \ 2 replies \ @bitcoingraffiti 7 Jul \ parent \ on: This Day on SN: July 7 meta
Oh, sorry. Thank you. I see now that's historic data. Oops.
I expected to find like a top 3. I think that'd be a great addition. I don't see value in knowing last year's top territory. I'd rather know yesterday's top 3.
Anyway, that's my unsolicited Monday feedback for you. Have a good day, partner. XD
5 sats \ 0 replies \ @bitcoingraffiti 7 Jul \ on: How Do You Measure a Child’s IQ? AskSN
IQ is a normal distribution with 100 as the mean, i.e. it is a relative measurement. So, say you wanna measure a 10 y/o IQ, you just run that result against peers only. IQ is known to be correlated with 'success', i.e. money, happiness, school performance. It might not be a perfect test, but it is indicative (and there lies it's functionality).
But you meant to say how do we measure intelligence. Perhaps the better question is, what is the goal for measuring? What does anyone want to get out of it?
By no means should it be interpreted as a final verdict. All tests have a sensitivity vs. selectivity trade-off. Which means no test can be fully discerning nor fully registering. But you're gonna have to use 'a' test (dependent on the goal).
0 sats \ 4 replies \ @bitcoingraffiti 7 Jul \ on: This Day on SN: July 7 meta
How come the top territory is 4x ~bitcoin? Same with the top stackers. Why can this be the same person multiple times?