pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @bitcoingraffiti 3h \ parent \ on: Daily Discussion Thread ~Music Saloon! Music
tun tun tun sahooooorrr
You are very lucky, ser. She values truth, reliability, and predictability. This is very good fortune. I commend you on your marital choice.
And did you buy in the end @BlokchainB?
Great trade so far.
I bought 100 shares initially and earlier today 125 more.
I'm very happy. Not that it affects my portfolio or anything, but it's always fun to have these side bets.
I'll hold it for a while, though it will depend if they'll make future purchases.
If you don't have anything nice to say, just go somewhere else. Don't waste my time with your dark tinted world view.
Ok, it's a good experiment.
But prefs should underperform the common stock. (maybe not if bought under par)
Otherwise Saylor's scheme wouldn't work, and there wouldn't be value creation, i.e. the bitcoin yield would be negative.
In his view the creditor is the sucker, and Bitcoin/common stock the superior asset.
The retail investor should just buy $MSTR.
Those prefs and converts only work by the grace of Bitcoin going up more, i.e. making the common stock go up (and outperforming the derivatives).
Those prefs are mostly for institutions with a mandate, and you're gonna lose relative to $MSTR.
Oh, sorry. Thank you. I see now that's historic data. Oops.
I expected to find like a top 3. I think that'd be a great addition. I don't see value in knowing last year's top territory. I'd rather know yesterday's top 3.
Anyway, that's my unsolicited Monday feedback for you. Have a good day, partner. XD
IQ is a normal distribution with 100 as the mean, i.e. it is a relative measurement.
So, say you wanna measure a 10 y/o IQ, you just run that result against peers only.
IQ is known to be correlated with 'success', i.e. money, happiness, school performance.
It might not be a perfect test, but it is indicative (and there lies it's functionality).
But you meant to say how do we measure intelligence.
Perhaps the better question is, what is the goal for measuring?
What does anyone want to get out of it?
By no means should it be interpreted as a final verdict.
All tests have a sensitivity vs. selectivity trade-off.
Which means no test can be fully discerning nor fully registering.
But you're gonna have to use 'a' test (dependent on the goal).
How come the top territory is 4x ~bitcoin?
Same with the top stackers. Why can this be the same person multiple times?