pull down to refresh
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @denationalized 8 Nov \ parent \ on: Bet on the US election with sats on bitcoinprediction.market bitcoin
@HYPERBITCOINZATION is a a good guy and the market is a decent business - my payout was manually done by him.
I'm too waiting for my payout. They should require onchain or liquid address as a just-in-case option of lightning not working.
I like the idea. That said, there are still ten pending payouts, as there were ten yesterday, remaining on this bet, https://www.bitcoinprediction.market/predictions/11/what-price-will-bitcoin-hit-by-november-5th . I know from your telegram group that you manually do payouts - this cannot scale if the market is to be popular in the future. When I was betting I was hoping to win some BTC and not to donate to the custodians of bitcoinprediction.market .
I would like to gamble on the US election results, prices of shitcoins going to zero , etc, not just on BTC mining. I am consistently good at it.
The way I do it on polymarket but without the fear of loosing my purchasing power. I think polymarket should switch to BTC or to at least something like wrapped BTC in order to encourage more long term bets.
It's just a shame that things on onions get old so quickly..
Very short-lived indeed. Was hoping to use it as there is problem with routing from my node to ff.io
Cypherpunks run code.
The problem is that if you speak up publicly for someone they just go without a warrant to your house, take your computer and try to steal your Bitcoin and you may end up in custody. Thus speaking for someone may preclude your ability of running code. At the very least it is like saying: "I am a domestic terrorist. Come and take me."
One can open a 0.01BTC channel but this is not a very efficient way of using LN. For dollar cost averaging it is just better to use a custodian wallet like <stacker.news> but with increasing adoption and recognition of Bitcoin such havens as SN may be soon clamped down on heavily and / or regulated out of existence.
BTC is great for spending. not so much for receiving without a custodian.