pull down to refresh
Try this, please: https://fiatjaf.com/04e9e814.html
Let me know if you have counter-arguments.
OK, I also wanted to ask that: if you thought it was a sound strategy to just have a bunch of ephemeral blockchains we can abandon, but I guess Thunder is already proposed as that.
That brings me to the next question: why not use Zcash sidechains as the payment scaling solution instead of Thunder?
(I know you'll say you don't make the rules and it is a possibility, but what is your opinion?)
In that case I'll change my question to:
Why would "google.com" be more valuable than just "google"? My understanding from a third read of the article now is that registering "google" will be allowed to anyone, so there is no point in keeping "google.com" protected.
Isn't the entire existence of TLDs just a big confusion? Why not make Bitnames concern itself with only a flat namespace of arbitrary names?
Watch the presentations at https://bitcoinhivemind.com/.
In current Zcash (both Orchard, Ironwood and previous pools) nodes have to keep a live index (that is searched for every transaction) of a random nullifier in order to prevent double spends, like a UTXO set that never shrinks, only increases on every transaction. Of course this scales horribly.
These are the stated reasons from Sean Bowe on why he is working on Tachyon, and he says this is a problem they always knew they had to solve one day.
More information: https://ggutoski.github.io/shielded-csv-tachyon/
How is it possible that Bitnames grandfathers ICANN names if ICANN has a million TLDs? And the configuration of the .com TLD changes all the time, who is going to manage that, and in fact it is full of namesquatting already anyway, so grandfathering ICANN will bring with it a bunch of free namesquatters.
I can't find a single place that accepts Bitcoin anywhere 100mi around where I am, so yes, we need more merchants.
This is very very interesting.
Don't you think it should be more structured? To enable easy parsing and aggregation later?
Also the name "pricestr" is great for a brand name, but if you want this to become a community effort I think the actual tag should be something more neutral, like just "price" maybe.
Hey, sorry for the late reply, but it didn't work: https://github.com/fiatjaf/bisu/issues/1#issuecomment-1445187731
This seems to fix the main issue: https://github.com/fiatjaf/bisu/pull/2
But it introduces one new issue.
I can't find any information about ShockNet's Razor, but it this reasonable? Isn't the idea of Lightning that it can be used by everybody for daily payments?
If yes, then you can't escape having it running on mobile.
If no, then why are we wasting time on it anyway?
By the way, it should be running on mobile phones, for free, with very easy setup, otherwise what are we doing?