pull down to refresh

I always thought that LN had good enough privacy. Lyn Alden did something similar a few ninths ago.
One thing I notice is that Super seems to be on his own here where as monero bro's are all coming in to defend.
107 sats \ 11 replies \ @ek 11h
good enough is apparently not good enough for the darknet though
"good enough" only means that it's private as long as you don't really need privacy that much
reply
Boltz is an interesting case. Depending on how you use it, it can break some chain analysis assumptions.
I'd prefer they not advertise as a DN service, though.
reply
22 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 8h
I think Boltz block any onchain addresses linked to terrorists.
reply
I've heard this too.
reply
22 sats \ 6 replies \ @OT 10h
Have we seen any agency capturing criminals using the lightning network yet?
reply
22 sats \ 5 replies \ @ek 10h
Have you seen any criminals using the lightning network?
reply
17 sats \ 3 replies \ @OT 10h
I'm sure there are plenty.
reply
17 sats \ 2 replies \ @ek 10h
Then I'm sure you can show me where I can buy weed online with lightning
Because I can show you plenty of places where you can do that with monero
Or why are you so sure?
reply
22 sats \ 1 reply \ @OT 10h
I can't but I don't see why a DN site couldn't have LN as an option. Maybe monero has the privacy network effects as of now.
How would the police catch someone from a LN invoice? Would they control a bunch of nodes and hope that the bad guy routes through them?
I have not. So it must be really private.
Q.E.D.
/s
reply
"darknet" being centralized message boards with a history of being honeypots and rug pulls
meaning the dumbest privacy larps on the internet
the fact that they're shitcoining instead of learning how to use Lightning is all the evidence one needs to conclude Lightning is infinitely more private
reply