(... Against Trump’s Constitutional Assaults Needs to Mobilize Both Courts and Public Opinion)
The article focuses on resisting Trump's EOs, as that's what the author is involved in, but I resisted the urge to ignore it and found that if you ignore the
Trump-policy-bad
centricity, there are some thoughts and concepts in there that I think are worth thinking about.Main topics:
How Winning [Losing] in Court Can Move Public Opinion and Trigger Action:
[T]he Institute for Justice (a libertarian public interest firm) litigated the case of Kelo v. City of New London, challenging the condemnation of homes for private economic development. In a badly flawed 2005 ruling, a narrow 5-4 Supreme Court majority rejected IJ’s argument that this taking violated the Fifth Amendment’s requirement that eminent domain can only be employed for a “public use.” But the decision caused a public outcry that led to the enactment of eminent domain reform laws in 45 states.
Public Opinion Leads to Victories in Court:
Craig v. Boren, the 1976 decision in which the Supreme Court ruled for the first time that laws discriminating on the basis of sex are presumptively unconstitutional and subject to heightened scrutiny, was in part a result of years of opinion-shaping activism by the feminist movement. Such a decision would have been impossible in earlier eras.
Time it right:
It is particularly important to recognize the limits of public attention and knowledge. Survey data shows most voters pay little attention to politics, and often don’t know even basic information about government and public policy—including judicial decisions. This makes it hard to attract public attention to more than a few legal battles at any given time.
Personally, I'm not a fan of these types of constructs where public opinion/outrage is used in legal battles and vice versa, because it feels like straight out manipulation, which can be used for both good and bad: subjective values, and that makes it even more dangerous. I can't help but feel that resistance to these kind of "resistances" is preferable and that using populist methods in attempts to defeat populism ultimately makes things worse.
Outrage is normalized and polarization seems to be the result right now; I wonder: return to stoicism when?