Listening to these people (without generalizing) on the podcast circuit, much less Twitter... I think they would be fanatical and hard-headed. In other words create a 'minority fork' that *they* don't actually believe is the minority fork.

To them it's the One True. So they would stick with it at least in the short term (that's what the influencers would say to do).

If Knots were to introduce soft fork rules that forbid some types of data transactions at the consensus level, they would probably have some method for activating this soft fork. If the activation fails to get broad support, they would be forced to decide to either create a minority fork that enforces the new consensus rules, or to "take the loss" and forego enforcing the new rules.

Murch

bitcoin

Influencers out in Storm: Is *This* the Hill to Die On?

028559d218

Could you explain this better? Take the L?