pull down to refresh

Ahmed Abdelaziz, M.D., from the Medical Research Group of Egypt at the Negida Academy in Arlington, Massachusetts, and colleagues evaluated the impact of endurance exercise on coronary atherosclerosis assessed by cardiac computed tomography in athletes and nonathletes. The analysis included data from nine observational studies (61,150 participants).
The researchers found that male athletes with an exercise volume of >3,000 MET-minutes/week showed higher mean coronary artery calcification (CAC) scores than nonathlete males (mean difference = 31.62). No difference in CAC was found for male athletes with 1,500 to 3,000 MET-minutes/week or female athletes with an exercise volume of 1,500 MET-minutes/week or greater. There were significant sex-specific differences for the association between exercise volume and calcified plaque number and volume by coronary computed tomography angiography.
I'm surprised this only affects men. Evolutionarily, you'd think men would be better adapted to endurance exercise. 3000 MET-minutes is extreme though, so I'm not sure this to mean "don't run."
I've gotten to know 2 guys in the past 6 months, both older (60's) and extreme exercisers. Think marathons, Ironman, getting up at 5 every day to run long distances.
But that's all in the past. BOTH of them seem to have really aged very quickly.
This is a pattern that I'm noticing. Extreme exercise does not seem to be linked to better health, in older age.
reply
None of us are adapted to modern amounts of arterial plaques. Evolution hasn't gotten to work on this yet.
I'd wager the difference between men and women comes down to selection bias on some combination of diet and workout habits, more than something physiological.
reply
Everything you do wears the body out.
Not doing anything also wears the body out, possibly faster.
reply
Well, I guess it's back to sitting on my ass.
reply