pull down to refresh
150 sats \ 9 replies \ @freetx 16 Jun \ parent \ on: What do you think is a fair mNAV for Strategy? bitcoin
You are 100% correct, but if that applied it would mean every non-dividend paying stock (GOOG, META, etc) should also be <1 NAV
If you owned 1 share of every listed stock, your dividend yield would be about 1.6% - which is an insanely low number. So to me that says that the market is about 5x overvalued.
reply
If you aren't being paid a dividend, exactly what value are you personally accruing from owning GOOG?
I would like you to invest $10,000 in my lemonade stand. I will never pay you a dividend, but I will give you a piece of paper that says you own a share.....maybe you can sell that to someone else for $15,000 in the future. Sounds good?
reply
You're partially right.
Here's the flipside: if I see in your business plan that you will reinvest the money that could go to my dividend into more lemonade stands, then I invest in your future growth by not cashing out the dividend
Because if you're an awesome company then you retaining the few % you'd pay out to investors could instead help growth into a lemonstand empire.
Now if you would propose I give you 10k for 5k worth of BTC because your lemon business is running at a loss cuz you suck at lemonade, I'd just lmao at your proposal and not exchange my 10M sats for your pathetic lil scheme.
reply
reply
reply
So lets assume my prospectus said I wouldn't pay dividends for next 10 years while we were in growth phase.
What would a dividend in 10 years need to be to make financial sense for you to lock up that money now? So using our numbers....you gave me $10,000 today. What type of dividend are you expecting in 10 years to make that a "good investment"?
so I could sell if I need liquidity
And the person that would buy your share would be in the same boat? They would be buying based on future dividend?