pull down to refresh

In this book, Sowell describes how intellectuals throughout history have misled the masses on important issues and never paid the price for it.
Thomas Sowell is a professor of economics at Cornell, UCLA, and other universities and collaborates on his studies at other relevant institutions, such as Stanford University.
He is also the author of several other books on economics and politics.
This book is divided into 9 chapters, where Sowell shows the vision that intellectuals have about different areas of society: economy, justice, war, etc.
But who are the "intellectuals"? Sowell defines the terms he uses early in the book :)
For Sowell, "intellectuals are an occupational category composed of people whose professional occupations operate fundamentally in function of ideas."
Example: writers, academics, journalists, etc. This does not include engineers or neurosurgeons, for example.
For Sowell, the work of an intellectual begins and ends with ideas.
But what is intellect, after all?
Intellect is the ability to grasp and manipulate complex concepts and ideas, which can lead to erroneous conclusions and, worse than that, senseless actions.
Marx's Capital is an example of an exquisite intellectual construction, but it is based on a conceptual error:
If it is true that "labor" (manipulation of materials) is the real source of wealth, why are countries with more labor not more prosperous?
Having defined intellect, Sowell defines what intelligence is: "it is the combination of intellect with the capacity for judgment and acuity in selecting relevant explanatory factors"
Intellect + judgment = intelligence.
But there is also the rarest quality of all: wisdom.
Wisdom is the ability to combine intellect, knowledge, experience, and judgment to produce a coherent assessment.
The opposite of wisdom is stupidity, whose manifestation is much more dangerous.
"George Orwell once said that some ideas are so stupid that only an intellectual can believe them, since the common man does not make himself so foolish."
Have you noticed that there are groups of people who disseminate and support the ideas of figures like Mao, Lenin, Hitler, Stalin...?
These people think they are superior to society and think they are doing good.
Sowell calls these groups of people the Intelligentsia.
Like intellectuals, the Intelligentsia exists on both the right and the left. And their main characteristic: they defend, without question, the ideas of all the intellectuals who are admired by their respective groups.
Does this remind you of anything?
Sowell gives the example of Bertrand Russell, an Englishman who was important to philosophy and mathematics and lived in the 1930s.
Russell eloquently argued that the only way to peace for his country would be to give up all military power.
The Intelligentsia of the time listened to and defended Russell's ideas, but the government, fortunately, did not.
At the end of the decade, Germany would trigger the Second World War.
Imagine what would have happened to Europe if the British parliament had listened to Russell, a mathematician?
17 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 12h
Thanks for this post. There are lots of Sowell fans here, for sure! Welcome to SN, and I hope you post often in this territory.
reply
Intellectuals wrestle with the 'truth', but the truth is changing as society and technology evolve. From a historical viewpoint we can criticize Marx but at the time of his thinking there was a conflict between capital and labour as new mechinization of the industrial revolution had concentrated wealth into the hands of factory owners and workers had migrated from rural work to urban factories. In most industrialized economies some degree of socialist ideas were adopted and the mixed economy came to be predominant in the post WW2 era, while Communist USSR and the mixed economies of the west then entered into the conflict that was the Cold War. Today China has a mixed economy and its productivity is demonstrably greater than the neoliberalised crony capitalist west. Humans organise into nation states because only in groups working collectively do humans gain the collective power to contest and acquire the limited resources and labour that are required to become a wealthy dominant economy. Today the conflict between China and its allies, Iran and Russia and N.Korea continues the contest between mixed/socialist economies and the west where today corporate sponsors dominate governments and democracy is frequently a farce. Yes intellectuals often advocate pacifism but they ignore the reality that the wealth of nations is an ongoing and probably unavoidable contest for resources and control of institutions and protocols and when trade fails to act as the medium of competition military conflict is the natural and almost inevitable consequence. To right off intellectuals is probably as dangerous as blindly accepting what they advocate- instead take their ideas and arguments as a starting place from which to question and explore their reasoning- and accept that as time goes by the 'truth' often changes. For example as we now enter the post industrial era of robotics, biotech, nanotech, digital technology and algorithms the concentration of power and wealth is shifting yet again to the owners of algorithms and internet platforms and the new currency of control is data.
reply
Well put.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @orto 3h
I know of one exception: M.K. Ataturk.
He was a leader who enlightened the darkness by offering his intellectual power to the service of the people. Yes, "wisdom" was perhaps his first name....
reply