@mega_dreamer, I have three resolutions that I think should be available:
"American boots on the ground in Iran"
"Iranian attack on America"
"More Israeli strikes on Iran"
pull down to refresh
pull down to refresh
@mega_dreamer, I have three resolutions that I think should be available:
"American boots on the ground in Iran"
"Iranian attack on America"
"More Israeli strikes on Iran"
Thanks - will list it soon.
Don't worry about that last one, since it's already happened.
Ok thanks. Yeah last on was very obvious.
I was mostly trying to make a point with that, because I was arguing with people who think we'll now be at everlasting peace with Iran.
Peace is bad for war mongers - they will never allow that to happen.
Which is why I was going to be happy to take their sats in that market.
Yeah kinda sad but that's the reality of life.
Last one will reach 100% probability in 5 secs
I literally just read that news, after posting.
Intensifies....
btw sorry for disrupting your shares 😋 https://beta.predyx.com/market/fifa-club-world-cup-winner-1749816663
The more the merrier
lol x infinity
First is good
Second may be hard to resolve. Would a missile launch at a us base in the region count? What about shooting down an American drone?
Third will be resolved instantly lol
I would propose a 4th: regime change in Iran by end of 2025
Got it - will be listing this as well.
The third one is already toast, from what I've seen.
I like the last one.
I think it should be easy enough to specify the parameters of the second one: bases and embassies are considered America, but American military personnel or equipment in or around Iranian territory are not and collateral damage is not counted.
I guess you mean you have three proposals for creation of markets.
It's a little confusing, but I think the resolution is also the statement in question.
Ahh ok. I blame English for it. haha.
1st and 2nd are good ones.
Yeah, the third one is already resolved Yes.
I sure hope not