@mega_dreamer, I have three resolutions that I think should be available:
"American boots on the ground in Iran"
"Iranian attack on America"
"More Israeli strikes on Iran"
pull down to refresh
0 new comment
98 sats \ 5 replies \ @noknees 22 Jun
Last one will reach 100% probability in 5 secs
reply
0 new comment
15 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 22 Jun
I literally just read that news, after posting.
reply
0 new comment
52 sats \ 0 replies \ @freetx 22 Jun
Intensifies....
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @noknees 22 Jun
btw sorry for disrupting your shares 😋 https://beta.predyx.com/market/fifa-club-world-cup-winner-1749816663
reply
0 new comment
15 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 22 Jun
The more the merrier
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 0 replies \ @noknees 22 Jun
lol x infinity
reply
0 new comment
42 sats \ 6 replies \ @mega_dreamer 22 Jun
Thanks - will list it soon.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 5 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 22 Jun
Don't worry about that last one, since it's already happened.
reply
0 new comment
42 sats \ 4 replies \ @mega_dreamer 22 Jun
Ok thanks. Yeah last on was very obvious.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 3 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 22 Jun
I was mostly trying to make a point with that, because I was arguing with people who think we'll now be at everlasting peace with Iran.
reply
0 new comment
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @mega_dreamer 22 Jun
Peace is bad for war mongers - they will never allow that to happen.
reply
0 new comment
101 sats \ 1 reply \ @Undisciplined OP 22 Jun
Which is why I was going to be happy to take their sats in that market.
view all 1 replies
42 sats \ 2 replies \ @SimpleStacker 22 Jun
First is good
Second may be hard to resolve. Would a missile launch at a us base in the region count? What about shooting down an American drone?
Third will be resolved instantly lol
I would propose a 4th: regime change in Iran by end of 2025
reply
0 new comment
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @mega_dreamer 22 Jun
Got it - will be listing this as well.
reply
0 new comment
30 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 22 Jun
The third one is already toast, from what I've seen.
I like the last one.
I think it should be easy enough to specify the parameters of the second one: bases and embassies are considered America, but American military personnel or equipment in or around Iranian territory are not and collateral damage is not counted.
reply
0 new comment
42 sats \ 3 replies \ @Coinsreporter 22 Jun
I guess you mean you have three proposals for creation of markets.
reply
0 new comment
10 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 22 Jun
It's a little confusing, but I think the resolution is also the statement in question.
reply
0 new comment
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @Coinsreporter 22 Jun
Ahh ok. I blame English for it. haha.
1st and 2nd are good ones.
reply
0 new comment
25 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined OP 22 Jun
Yeah, the third one is already resolved Yes.
reply
0 new comment
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @blogclif 22 Jun
I sure hope not
reply
0 new comment