pull down to refresh

Before I realized it was already a well known thing, something like Dunning-Kruger occurred to me.

I thought of it as being iterative, though. As we learn new things, we overestimate ourselves for a bit until we realize that we’re still dumb. Then we learn something else and repeat the cycle.

52 sats \ 1 reply \ @freetx 26 Jun

There is a corollary to DK Effect that sorta works in reverse:

  • Newb thinks the topic is simple
  • Mid-level knowledge thinks same topic is super complicated with tons of variables
  • Expert level thinks the topic is simple

That is, when we are at "mid-level" knowledge we are aware of all these conditional variables but we haven't totally integrated them yet....eventually we integrate these into our mental model and sort of flatten it down to a simplistic model again.

reply

That’s almost exactly the framework I had in mind, but as we collapse one topic back to “simple” we become aware of new tangential topics and go through the cycle again.

reply
I thought of it as being iterative, though

The temporal factor is a thing, I like this.

we overestimate ourselves for a bit until we realize that we’re still dumb. Then we learn something else and repeat the cycle.

And we never get to the point of not being dumb?

reply

No, we’re always dumb. We just aren’t always aware of it.

reply
142 sats \ 1 reply \ @ek 26 Jun

I would say we will always be dumb in way more ways than we're smart

reply

I'd add: on any topic and that even if we're the ultimate source of knowledge today, if not tomorrow we're outdated, it will be the day after tomorrow, because the collective evolves faster than we can grasp it.

reply

Yes, that's what I think too.

reply