pull down to refresh

I'm not sure if I totally follow the reasoning, here.
Why not still hold straight bitcoin, but keep enough of a bank balance to cover your cash needs for whatever timeframe puts you at ease?
Guess that's an option. No yield, locking in loss...?
reply
You're the one who's uncomfortable with bitcoin's sudden plunges.
This seems like a cleaner way to be in bitcoin without needing to worry about short term cash flow.
reply
I wonder if it's something about the lock-up, a corporate security/financial instrument that signals savings over potential consumption.
I'll think more about it
reply
42 sats \ 0 replies \ @OT 13h
This.
Sats bought a few years ago are already in a winning position to spend on your week to week needs.
reply