pull down to refresh

It's been strange to me how quiet on-chain activity has been for the past six-ish months with so much investor fervor and the grind higher. I can't help wondering if all the transactions that might have happened on-chain are now happening elsewhere, e.g. exchanges, ETF's, bitcoin treasuries, etc.
Are these effectively layer two's? Of course they don't have the same technical properties as a "true" layer two but in practice they seem to achieve the same outcome: managing and consolidating transaction activity efficiently off the main chain.
Duck typing > semantic pedantry.
reply
121 sats \ 0 replies \ @SwapMarket 9h
no, they are custodial wallets
reply
21 sats \ 1 reply \ @grayruby 12h
I think if they were in kind redemption you could argue this.
I guess it depends how literal you want to be in describing layer two.
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 11h
Exactly
ETFs are an investment product. Exchanges are a trading platform. Bitcoin treasuries are capitalism.
reply
They're just users, they actually generate on-chain activity when they acquire or liquidate... imagine how much less activity there would be without them.
reply
So without ETFs... wouldn't there technically be more?
reply
There'd be much, much less.
reply
100 sats \ 0 replies \ @Car 11h
Get your hands on real bitcoin and secure it. Follow @DarthCoin guides.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @nichro 2h
Calling it layer 2 is not accurate, but in the sense that it takes a big load of the chain (which I think is what you posit) then I would agree.
Basically the folks who were just trading and "investing" before now have an option to do it without touching the chain even if it's potentially paper Bitcoin and they can only do it M-F from 9:30 to 4pm
reply
They are layer 3 ¼.
reply
Yeah, love ur post
A layer 2 is a protocol that provides users the ability to leave an offchain system if its operators go offline and also ensures that the operators of a system cannot cheat. Both of these assumptions need to be provable and enforced onchain.
reply
I wrote about this some time ago and I don't think I would call them a layer 2 but rather an abstraction.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 13h
No, but yes they have a similar effect on onchain activity I'd guess.
reply