pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 8 replies \ @optimism 29 Jun \ on: Raise a Glass to the Shuttering of Climate.gov science
I asked my chinese-made AI to list me sources of weather and climate measurements that are subjected to rigorous methodologies and public transparency. It named this as the #2 listed source of that, after NASA, before Copernicus.
Is there any rigorous methodology to shutting it down though... Would like to see those measurements. Just, you know, to not trust but verify.
it is turtles all the way down
reply
I don't give 2 shits about the anti-Co2 climate cult. Fuck these guys. Also fuck all the anti-anti-Co2 climate cultists. They're all retarded fanatics.
I just worry about 2 things:
- What happens with the underlying raw data? If these measurements survive and continue then this is just some narrative-level politics. Anyone can run whatever biased model they like.
- But: if you fight fire with fire, there's probably going to be more fire. So I hope there's really good argumentation.
reply
Exactly it is completely narrative politics. “The data” lol!
What, did the native aboriginal people in Australia record all the underwater reef temperatures correctly and carve them into stone for us to find thousands of years later? Or did we use the tree rings and ice patterns to figure out the temperature millions of years ago??? Lmao
So- it becomes a political and psychological battle.
Co2 is plant food.
More Co2 = more plants.
Arguing about “data” is not going to achieve anything.
reply
Agree. Now, if someone wants to waste their time researching this then I'm all for it. From taxpayer money I don't really care because I doubt its my tax contribution, but for the sake of argument, better find someone willing to spend their own money on it.
All this is about government spending in the end. Not how much, but on what narrative.
Opt. Out.