pull down to refresh

Very good analysis here. Thanks for doing the work. As more territory tools are rolled out (hopefully soon) there could be more collaboration similar to what @grayruby and undisciplined have set up informally by trusting each other. I look forward to sat splits with territory marketers, content writers, etc. I know we're a long way from that now, but it should be the goal in my opinion.
Co-ownership makes a big difference for ~HealthAndFitness, since we're splitting the shortfall four ways.
I'd love for them to implement my idea for publicly funded territories, where anyone can contribute towards the rent and then revenue is split in proportion to what was contributed.
reply
I like that
reply
Yea ~HealthAndFitness is carried by literally a handful of stackers and it’s hard when even one of our cofounders (cough @grayruby cough) doesn’t even post in the territory!
What I got out of this tho @denlillaapan @Undisciplined is that post and comment cost makes no difference so staying at 200/10 we go!!
Didn’t know music was 10 sats/comment
But shouldn’t zaps matter?? @stackerstats
reply
Fuckers.
Even though I've been on strike and contributed basically nada, you're flourishing without me.
Not nice.
reply
Time to join us
reply
Can't beat em, join em
42 sats \ 1 reply \ @Bell_curve 22h
hopefully sub-territories are on the roadmap still
reply
They are, but I'm not sure how soon.
reply
I'm not sure revenue sharing will really attract more/new authors. It seems to me that one of the best things territory owners can do to help their writers is aiding in content discovery and visibility. Your newsletter is a great example. Territories that help writers get seen can make a compelling case for being home for things the writers create.
reply