pull down to refresh

Even if it's wizard jpgs?
reply
Yes. If it makes it into blocks, it means people are using Bitcoin (and also bitcoin).
reply
Yeah I think the difference between our thinking here is for me adoption is BTC adoption, not blockchain adoption. If people want to adopt blockchain they can go do that elsewhere afaic.
reply
Do you think there can be significant BTC adoption without full blocks (given current consensus rules)?
reply
Feels like a trick question. But yes, I think so, though I think it unlikely that in the face of significant adoption (as MoE) there will not be full blocks.
reply
It wasn't meant to be a trick question. I'm trying to understand where we differ.
for me adoption is BTC adoption, not blockchain adoption.
I understand you to mean by this that blocks full of jpgs are not adoption?
If yes, this extends to "only monetary transactions count as adoption."
I like monetary transactions, but I also think any transaction that makes it into a block ultimately increases adoption of BTC.
Imagine a world where ASCII art became wildly popular in China. This would not be using English as language, but it might increase the adoption of English in China.
Wizard jpgs in Bitcoin blocks are like this, except they are required to actually use bitcoin as money too (pay fees to miners).