pull down to refresh

what is stopping the rest of the internet from moving towards pay to post?
I'd speculate that most platforms don't want to be niche, as then they'd have less marks to sell ads to and/or steal data from.
do you think pay to post will always be niche?
(no hope that the a slop gets so deep, pay to post becomes the default?)
reply
102 sats \ 4 replies \ @optimism 22h
Yes, because slop is normal.
From where I'm sitting the majority of tweets, fb posts, mass media articles and broadcasts, youtube videos, tiktok shorts, reddit posts... have always been slop, also before autocorrect made Sam rich.
reply
have always been slop
This resonates. I'm finding it takes me a little longer to identify llm-produced slop than rando-insane-internet person slop. I need to squint more, I guess.
reply
102 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 22h
Does the source matter though? I'm not going to give people medals for writing their own slop.
The benefit of pay-to-post is that it attracts people that don't just post slop, but actually put in some thought and/or work. I'd say it causes selection more than it causes encouragement.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 21h
perhaps this is the point: a pay-to-post forum selects for people who take their time seriously.
reply
Yes! This is why I think it'll stay niche.
But niche is awesome imho: I've spent my best time on the interwebs in niche places.