pull down to refresh

While some in the Bitcoin community are celebrating this Act as a victory for the industry and as a good thing for Bitcoin, it seems many have forgotten why Bitcoin exists in the first place. This level of myopia and selective amnesia is shocking but not at all surprising. Fiat isn't just a payment system but it's also a cancerous mindset that afflicts many. What they aren’t grasping is that this Act’s main purpose is regulatory capture not “modernization of payment systems.” Secondly it forces every digital dollar to flow through state-controlled gatekeepers who would enforce OFAC sanctions and blacklist wallet addresses at the behest of the state.
While others celebrate regulatory capture masquerading as legitimacy, remember: the goal was never to make digital dollars more efficient. It was to make money free.
I’m a hard core Bitcoiner and I think stablecoin payments is a massive improvement for digital payments.
It’s better than checks, ACH, Zelle, debit and credit card networks.
This idea that people aren’t already cucked by the system is ridiculous! Both American and Canadian banks got us by the balls. The Canadian government turned off the money for truckers and I bet you most Canadians still have a fiat bank account.
I embrace the movement forward for making fiat payments better. Until things that matter start accepting bitcoin this is what we are stuck with.
reply
bitcoin doesn't care
reply
Bit by bit, they're snatching what took years to build. And the worst part is, it's with the blessing of a bunch of big-shot "bitcoiners".
reply
130 sats \ 2 replies \ @freetx 6h
Secondly it forces every digital dollar to flow through state-controlled gatekeepers who would enforce OFAC sanctions and blacklist wallet addresses at the behest of the state.
Can someone explain this bit in more detail? Are they saying:
  • P2P use of shitcoins / stablecoins will now be illegal?
  • Or, shitcoins / stablecoins that transact thru regulated financial markets will be subject to same regulations as everything else?
reply
This already happens with American banks!
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @KudzaiK 4h
What I meant by that, is to say stablecoin issuers have now been absorbed into the same fiat cartel as banks and which means laws like the Bank secrecy act and sections of the Patriot Act are now part of their compliance toolkit. OFAC can lean on and influence them the same way it does banks. Hope it makes sense
reply
Can't see Bitcoiner celebrating it the same way they celebrated ETFs. I don't think those who know Bitcoin, show any love for Genius. And those who're doing are just the vicious fiat maxis.
reply
97 sats \ 2 replies \ @grayruby 6h
Couldn't put it better myself. Well said.
These bills were way more pro crypto and allowing them to imbed themselves within the tradfi fiat system than pro bitcoin.
reply
20 sats \ 0 replies \ @KudzaiK 3h
That’s it! It’s regulatory capture in the name of legitimacy where the trick is to say, bitcoin has won because the state has given it its blessing when it’s an insidious move to maintain dollar supremacy and relegate bitcoin to being a commodity
reply
40 sats \ 0 replies \ @kepford 4h
Yep, exactly.
Far too many bitcoiners have selective hearing. They don't realize how little care and understanding there is about what makes bitcoin what it is. Been hearing more and more tradfi people talk about bitcoin and crypto and they do not get it. They are at maybe a 2017 mindset at best. Still talking about blockchain and difference chains... They don't get proof of work. I mean they don't even mention it. They don't get most of bitcoin's fundamentals.
People are talking past one another.
reply
36 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby 6h
In the same way that visa/MasterCard/other credit card companies and payment processors have become the primary means by which we spend money on the internet, stablecoins are likely to occupy a similar role between us and our money.
I wonder though how long they will remain useful: if they bend the knee to regulators, their big edge on tradfi (being faster and easier because they aren't as heavily regulated) goes away. So what will be their edge vs normal payment processors?
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @KudzaiK 4h
This article is the warning to let you know that they have been captured. That’s why I wrote it because it’s not being pitched that way in the msm
reply