pull down to refresh

dear writers of SN

inspired by @TotallyHumanWriter, specifically a comment he made on his well-executed list of writing tips yesterday, i wanted to reach out first and get a sense of how the community responds to an idea i've been cooking up.
many of you are writers. creative or otherwise. all of you are readers, presumably. also, probably, some of you are bitcoiners. as reading and writing bitcoiners, i think it is in all our best interest that we be always seeking to improve ourselves so we can seize the opportunity that our long and prosperous lives hold. you may already do this by reading one another's work and taking mental notes; of course, there are also ai tools, and you can self-edit until the cows come home. But, there's probably no better antidote to your worst writing habits like having a good reader give you an honest critique.
also, just having a reliable person to hear you out, vis-a-vis what was said here, is a great way to refine how you think about things.
i read excellent content here and in ~BooksAndArticles all the time, and unfortunately it feels like people are hesitant to leave very much feedback on the writing, especially feedback that might be constructive or critical. on the one hand, i would consider this a feature of the SN community and i appreciate there haven't really been many trolls dampening our experience here. however, i think a certain dose of sober critique could be productive, or at least interesting.
when i say 'sober critique,' i mean that there is a very fine line that we ought to walk, for that is the skill of editing. do we trash all ideas and works we don't like, take a sledge to the foundations based on our preference/taste? not necessarily, but having the tact to nudge someone else to be 1-10% better, now that might just work.

the stacker news writers' club

the idea is to have an SN writing partner whose work you will read, and who will read your work. you and your partner will be focused on helping one another improve their writing and refine their thinking. 'improve' is purposefully ambiguous. but a good writing partner engages with your ideas, your style and your form.
hopefully, if there is considerable handful of you interested, i will try to pair you with another stacker of a similar interest and level of commitment. you subscribe to each other for a given interval of time (i'm thinking 2 weeks?) then, each of you does your thing, writing and posting on SN as usual. your challenge is to try to write a substantial comment on the other person's writing for each of their posts.
what is a substantial comment? there's no strict definition. if you want to follow the one strength and one weakness model you can. the only goal is to help your partner improve without utterly destroying them.
finally, at the end and throughout the interval, i can create an accountability checklist, similar to undisciplined's in ~HealthAndFitness, where participants can voluntarily share what their experience has been. these will function as a check-in of sorts.

feedback welcome

so what do you think? is this a good use of SN's pay-to-post model? does this low-time preference community care enough about self-improvement? or am i way off the mark?
please share your feedback below.
and lastly, if you are interested, please feel free indicate so in the comments here, including your what genre it is you are interested in working on (being as specific as possible) and the approximate amount of time you (wish to) spend writing each week.
yours,
unschooled
this territory is moderated
As I writer I find it more important to spend time writing than to talk about what I'm writing. For newer writers, though, it might come in handy.
reply
the point would be to write and post as always, except you commit to engaging with someone else's writing with the expectation that they engage with yours.
im not sure what you are saying -- is it that you prefer not to with engage others on what you've written?
reply
is it that you prefer not to with engage others on what you've written?
Generally. It gets in the way of just writing the thing you ought to write in my experience. Starts bringing in a lot of baggage that you start thinking about instead of writing.
reply
i understand that.
im of the opinion that unpacking the baggage, airing out its contents and putting them under the light can be a good practice. but to each their own
reply
This is an excellent idea, and I appreciate the thoughtful framing.
Bitcoiners, especially those on SN, are already learning to value personal responsibility and continuous improvement. It's trust-minimized, PoW-maximized. The idea of having a writing buddies to help me refine my thinking without totally rug-pulling my self-esteem sounds... oddly healthy. Almost like we’re forking SN into a writer’s dojo. Count me in.
Yours, Kondwani
reply
forking SN into a writer’s dojo.
not necessarily, but i take your point. everything happens on here in exactly the same way except that writers who are serious about their craft can 'meet' to talk shop!
reply
Good idea and also, this is exactly what a good comment on a post ought to be anyway.
Too positive and it seems like brown nosing for SATs
Too negative and the writer will shut down.
A good mix of positive and negative thoughtful feedback gets the most zaps.
reply
fair point.
do you think there is value in encouraging more of those comments that not only prompt discussion, but also prompt constructive feedback for the writer?
reply
Absolutely
reply
I could be interested in this but I have been up for 23 hours. So I’ll re-read this when my mind is settled.
reply
sounds good Jimmy, for now get some sleep
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @398ja 30m
I love the idea, but I cannot commit. I very often go through periods where I feel the need to retreat from social media, like now. In these moments, I feel no desire to write anything. At most, I will just read and zap quietly...
reply