In light of what one has witnessed in the course of approximately the last five years, most readers would probably not find it difficult to relate the notion of ‘defiling (or desacralising, violating) the human body’ to the time in which we live. Think of the accumulating evidence, that the so-called Covid ‘vaccines’ contain nanoscale items which change the human body into something it was not before the jab was administered (more on this below). However, one may be less inclined to connect this idea with historical events dating back centuries, which may nonetheless be understood as providing a suitable backdrop for a comprehension of what has been happening recently, probably for a number of decades already.

The historical events in question date back to the beginning of the 14th century, when a papal bull (named after the leaden seal or ‘bulla’ which marked it as authentic) was issued (by Pope Boniface the 8th), which decreed that it was prohibited by the Catholic Church to cut the body of a deceased person into pieces, because it was in conflict with the Church’s sacraments.

The context in which this happened is interesting, to say the least, and concerns the seven Christian crusades aimed at liberating Jerusalem from Mohammedan occupation. My source is the first of the fascinating two-volume study of the Dutch phenomenologist, J.H. Van den Berg, titled Het Menselijk Lichaam, Part One – Het Geopende Lichaam (The Human Body – The Opened Body; Callenbach Publishers, Nijkerk, 1959). These volumes trace the changing conceptions of the human body from approximately the 14th century until the 20th century, against the backdrop of Hippocrates’s notion of medical treatment in ancient Greece. …

Perhaps the final blow to our bodily integrity and its irreplaceable value comes from a 2023 study, where the researchers found that – contrary to what so-called fact-checkers had claimed – ‘…mRNA COVID vaccines permanently integrate into the DNA of some COVID-vaccinated people.’ Put bluntly, it has the capacity to alter human DNA, changing one from Homo and Gyna sapiens into something else, namely a biogenetically altered ‘variation’ on our naturally evolved hominin species. Does anyone have the right to use, or abuse, genetic science to change the human body in what can only be described as a violent, violating manner? I think not.

It is superfluous to labour the point further; I believe it has been shown that, compared to the value attached to the human body in the 14th century, as witnessed in the refusal of two anatomists (one of them rather ambivalently), to ‘sin’ by dissecting the deceased human body, judging by the consequences of receiving (particularly the mRNA) Covid jab in the present time, powerful agencies have no compunction about defiling and damaging the bodies of human beings. This is abundantly demonstrated by many scientific studies, which reveal the detrimental, and in many instances lethal, effects on people’s bodies of the contents of these pseudo-vaccines. I believe that this cynical disregard of the value and moral integrity of the human body – clearly perceptible in 14th-century attitudes – is symptomatic of a pervasive nihilism on the part of the ‘people’ who have orchestrated the unconscionable assault in question.