pull down to refresh

Ordinarily, light waves pass through each other without any trouble. But when quantum mechanics is involved, something strange happens.
At the heart of this puzzle lies light-by-light scattering, a quantum process where particles of light, or photons, briefly transform into other particles. Ordinarily, light waves pass through each other without any trouble. But when quantum mechanics is involved, something strange happens: photons can interact through the creation of virtual particles that pop in and out of existence. These fleeting particles, though invisible, leave a measurable imprint on other particles.
As a side note, the following was one of my first "awe" experiences during one of my QFT courses during grad school, i.e., the Casimir effect, which states that two plates can feel a force acting on each other _in the vacuum, that is, in the absence of any matter. This can be explained by the creation of virtual particles that pop in and out of existence. The vacuum cannot have zero energy because of this vacuum energy.
One of those affected is the muon, a heavier cousin of the electron. How the muon “wobbles” in a magnetic field—its so-called anomalous magnetic moment—depends in part on these tiny interactions. The muon's magnetic behavior, often described using the formula aμ = (g–2)μ / 2, has been the subject of years of high-precision experiments and theory. Even the tiniest deviation between the theoretical prediction and experimental result can hint at unknown physics.
That’s why the upcoming results from the Fermilab experiment are so important. Scientists there are about to cut the experimental uncertainty in half, narrowing it from 22×10⁻¹¹ to roughly 11×10⁻¹¹. But with increased precision comes pressure. Theory must now meet that same level of detail, and one of the biggest obstacles is the hadronic light-by-light (HLbL) scattering contribution. It’s a notoriously tricky piece to calculate, involving strong nuclear forces and a tangle of particle interactions.
This kind of super-small incremental precision improvements felt too abstract to me. Even though this kind of physics looked amazing, I didn't see myself working in this field.
reply