pull down to refresh

68 sats \ 3 replies \ @k00b 9h
It's a gaussian notion of recent - meaning it's biases toward more recent content but is not ordered strictly.
We did this because it's hard to maintain relevance and recency simultaneously. I'll create a github issue if we don't have one.
In the meantime clamping it by time, e.g. 1 week should help.
reply
This issue has come up a number of times now and makes it clear that user expectations for recent is that it'll be a strict recency sort order.
I wonder if recent searches should be keyword only, sorting all keyword matches strictly by date.
I vaguely remember that being the case before, but there was some other bug that made it too restrict thus often returning null results.
reply
Yeah, I’d noticed this was happening before. I think your solution’s the best one. One rule in software is: don’t do stuff the user didn’t ask for.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @k00b 9h
Your memory matches mine. In cases where there are otherwise no results, people want recent to be less strict. When there are many results, people want recent to be strict.
reply