pull down to refresh

20 sats \ 3 replies \ @south_korea_ln 4 Aug \ on: AnEvidence-DrivenCritiqueofAllegedly ReassuringStudyonAluminum-AdjuvanteVaccines science
Related: #1055660
write
preview
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 4 Aug
I think that article was about the research that found mercury was good for you. What BS. Those idiots really had the gall to draw those conclusions. Also the same for the other substances that are adjuvants.
reply
30 sats \ 1 reply \ @south_korea_ln 4 Aug
The link i provided here is about the Anderson article, i.e. the one about aliminum adjuvants. Unlike yours, it takes the conclusions at face value.
Shared it so people have more context.
The statistics discussion in your article are quite interesting. Food for thought.
reply
77 sats \ 0 replies \ @Rothbardian_fanatic OP 4 Aug
I wonder if people believe that direct observation is valid anymore. There are a lot of direct observations of people working with mercury as hatters becoming insane from mercury contact with both the metals and vapors from the metals. Perhaps thimerosal is a different kind of material, but that is doubtable. Also, directly injecting it into the body does not strike me as a good way to use it.
reply