pull down to refresh
Yep, I've used CJDNS in the past. It wasn't at a level that was good for discovering things. Has that changed? I know they were working on a kind of app ecosystem similar to Roku?
reply
reply
I got to see the net do that with linkshares. It seems like good discovery always yields to crap given enough time. Probably Google is why. "Don't be evil! Ah, EFF that, we want money! Also power!"
reply
Yes. And you don't need to be the CEO of a big tech company to be like that; company-men and -women will glady join the party-line and pitch you their benevolence while the founders at night have trouble gaslighting themselves that this is what they envisioned. I've worked for and with many companies that were founded on deep ideals (not goog though) and the stories leadership tells themselves to sleep well at night are often cringe.
That said, you will often see an internal push "to do good" in these types of companies and once in a while the great deeds surface. Ideals are expensive, so I get it. But that's an argument against giants and for the little guy.
But, since talk is cheap, I'll go figure out - tomorrow, as it's late for me - what it takes to run a wiki on cjdns and report back. Being the change makes the difference, I think.
reply
Hey, I'm all about that! Taking action and letting others know is a big part of why things don't change!
reply
cjdnscould give you privacy at the (overlay) transport layer all by itself for example, and you can already run Bitcoin Core with this. Now you have privacy and MoE. Then what you need is chatter and collaboration, for which you can use whatever you want over thetun.