pull down to refresh
202 sats \ 4 replies \ @siggy47 3h
My first comment in the territory. I feel like a fool. I must have muted the territory way back when. I never check territory stats, but I did yesterday. I saw AI near the top, and wondered why I never saw posts from that territory. To boot, @optimism is the founder. I really like his content. Oh well.
reply
36 sats \ 1 reply \ @SimpleStacker 10m
Woops! You've been missing out. ~AI territory has had a lot of bangers
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @siggy47 9m
I know.
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 3h
Thanks for the nice words. No need to feel like a fool though, I only revived it late June because after it's archival, posts on the subject were scattered all over SN and easy to miss (and @Scoresby started asking questions in the saloon.)
I wasn't the only one thinking that it should be revived, just the first to part with 50k sats.
reply
36 sats \ 0 replies \ @ea OP 3h
thanks
reply
0 sats \ 2 replies \ @stack_harder 1h
i mean how would an AI bot be able to get my btc in cold storage?
for something like a browser hot wallet i get it, i remember a few years back in the nft craze how many peoples metamask were getting hacked from clicking things, random airdrops etc
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ea OP 42m
in any case, the material talks about attacks where the user downloads malicious software without knowing it.
On the other hand, keeping your assets cold is what he recommends.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ea OP 1h
I wouldn't know how to answer, but the problem lies, I think, in unpatched security gaps.
reply
0 sats \ 1 reply \ @optimism 4h
Its good to assess the safety of your sats sometimes. If however an AI bot would change your assessment, assess the assessment, because you've probably been vulnerable to non-AI malware or non-AI social engineering too.
reply
0 sats \ 0 replies \ @ea OP 4h
thanks
reply