pull down to refresh

You can't really compare a downstream fork (and especially not a rebasing one) to its upstream though, that's not apples to apples, because the fork can (and often does, also outside of this particular instance) include all or much of the upstream work too. Besides, Core is still the reference client, so you can't really compare any other Bitcoin client to that.
What you can do is compare btcd to libbitcoin, or compare knots to Peter's libre-relay if you want apples-to-apples.
202 sats \ 4 replies \ @Murch 3h
In case it's not obvious from @Scoresby's post, these two tweets were not in the same thread.
reply
102 sats \ 2 replies \ @optimism 2h
My comment wasn't personally directed at you.
reply
100 sats \ 1 reply \ @Scoresby OP 2h
I didn't take them as such. But I am the one who combined these posts from @murch when they were posted in separate contexts.
I didn't think it through all that much, so your comments were helpful and much appreciated. But it raises the question in my mind next: when should one delete a post (I don't want to mislead anyone who doesn't read the comments here) versus leaving it up because it might help with education if they do read the comments?
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 2h
Just pin an explainer.
reply
Yes, it's definitely me who, in my ignorance, was drawing the comparison here. I probably should have made that more clear.
reply
202 sats \ 1 reply \ @alice_bob 6h
Yeah they know but in the absence of solid arguments it only remains to spread FUD to fill hollow skulls.
reply
102 sats \ 0 replies \ @optimism 6h
Echo chambers be echochamberin'...
It's the suckiest thing, because individually, the people involved are awesome... but I guess it's only human for lotalty to the tribe to trump common sense. It's lonely being an outsider.
reply