pull down to refresh
5 sats \ 10 replies \ @jbschirtzinger OP 10h \ parent \ on: RFC for Crypto Regulation tech
If the government asks for input, and no one dissents, who is gonna be to blame do you suppose?
Your comment argues with Bank Secrecy Act that already legalized screening your transactions with no due process. So your arguments will be thrown away immediately. A better dissent is if everyone just type the four letters I mentioned.
reply
shrugs. Do you think this is the first time I've experienced having my arguments being thrown away immediately?
reply
No ))
reply
You'd be right. The point isn't whether or not the argument is thrown away, but rather, the point is giving people the opportunity to throw it away or do something else with it.
reply
Your comment is too long and off topic. They did not ask for opinions on whether the total surveillance is good or bad. They want citizens' input on whether these innovative methods will be robust enough, to make them even more effective.
If all comments are anonymous, why do they block Tor browser?
reply
So your solution, clearly, is to shut up. That's fine. You have that right. You are also missing the entire point of what I'm saying, and that's fine.
reply
No, we can express our opinions with shorter comments. The government will ignore them, but other people will see that they are not alone. Right now I see that most comments are negative, with only one real list of suggestions from a legal company that obviously wants to be hired. As others said in this thread, playing their games is a waste of time. Just ignore the noise and use bitcoin on platforms that do not KYC.
reply
You are fighting the wrong battle. This thread is for people who want to have a voice. You don't, so silence is your best option.