pull down to refresh
0 sats \ 17 replies \ @Undisciplined 16h \ on: Hedging your bets, learn from @Undisciplined oracle
Unless we end up between 1.4M and 1.5M
True. Those are the edge cases that can fuck it all up.
At this point, I would expect a
yes
voter from the 1.4M to either know something we don't (e.g. @ek, who knows about an HR play for the coming months to increase SN adoption) or to actively skew the market in their favor (e.g. @Coinsreporter starting to post 1000s of posts per day).reply
Even with those cases, I'm reasonably confident they won't land right in between the two marks.
reply
reply
Haha still funny to me that people are betting on something that at least one of the other bettors has literal direct control over
reply
I see it differently.
I see it as a way to reward/incentivize this other bettor to make the unlikely happen, thanks to his more direct control.
If I lose this bet, I'll feel good about it, because then it means SN is doing better than expected.
reply
That's right, it's a win-win
reply
Seems like a bot has started doing just that...
2000 posts in last 30 minutes...
reply
And somehow if we land in between, you lose both of your bets. Your strategy is same like your nym just @Undisciplined, doesn't know where it's heading to...haha
reply
I have already made my sats back by trading all the movement, so I'm not too worried about it.
reply
Hello no, I can't post 1000 posts per day to win this, it won't be worth it I'm not winning at least a million. Right now we're exactly falling behind by 1000 items/day but I'm putting my faith into time which I believe is still not over.
reply
reply
We may fall behind by 100k items if the current trend continues. I'm seeing a continuous collapse in activity on SN for the last few days if not months.
Maybe the reward being cut in half is the reason. But we can't do anything about it. It wasn't a good move to repair when something wasn't broken.
reply