Hi all!
Oleg here from Fulgur.Ventures. We are a VC focused on early stage bitcoin and lightning startups. I've been following the lightning network ecosystem since 2018 and it's a never ending learning. In my previous life I did product management and business development for software companies that were building on very new technology when they started.
Curious about technology startups or anything else bitcoin lightning VC - just ask.
Oleg
Most traditional startups get asked "What is your exit strategy?" meaning a Merger, Acquisition, or an IPO. Do you see these as the same for bitcoin and lightning startups? What exits are realistic for bitcoin startups?
reply
Thank you for a great question that resonates with me personally. Investor liquidity is a pressing issue for traditional VC because this is how VC industry is measured in general. However recent changes in macro, finance and liquidity markets including crypto, have exaggerated pursuit for liquidity to enormous scale leading to significant decoupling between the amount of accrued enterprise value and the liquidity obtained by investors. Personally, I want to believe that this disproportion is temporary and will go away.
In bitcoin and lightning ecosystem, neither VCs nor founders that we have been meeting seem to be overfocused on obtaining liquidity. The ecosystem follows the low time preference ethos. It does not remove the question of liquidity from its existence. And also to have more traditional VCs invest in this space, they need to understand their liquidity options. So we encourage startups to think through how they sustainably accumulate enterprise value over time while they keep building the entire ecosystem.
If VCs and founders are aligned on how enterprise value accumulates, liquidity opportunities will follow. Usually industries go through midterm consolidation phases that provide for MnA opportunities. In the long run, we hope to see more bitcoin enterprises reach public markets too, or markets of secondary stock transfers. Maybe these types of markets will be powered by bitcoin native financial solutions. Some companies could still generate investor returns while remaining private.
Many applications in the space are aimed at novel payment solutions. Payments are one of the most natural ways to capture business value, so there is a lot of opportunity to accumulate enough enterprise value that will find liquidity.
Also bitcoin is possibly a new type of monetary system, so maybe there will be totally new ways of generating liquidity in the ecosystem.
reply
1005 sats \ 1 reply \ @kr 21 Dec 2022
are you seeing meaningful changes to the the number of lightning deals being done and the valuation of those deals?
reply
We see more and more projects that can help advance the ecosystem to the next level in terms of technology, infrastructure maturity and also adoption. Examples are games, content platforms, liquidity solutions, payment systems. But also projects that explore previously underexplored areas such as settlement for energy payments or micropayments between automated systems.
This year had a lot of distracting factors that affect deal flow and dynamics, such as end of bull run, other crypto crashes. So it is probably not the most indicative year to assess.
What holds true this year and before, is that we mostly see reasonable valuations and very committed thoughtful founder teams, as compared to maybe average VC dealflow. Recently we also see inflow of business-focused founders with prior experience from other industries, as well as non-bitcoin VCs showing interest in lightning deal.
reply
What technology or products outside of the Lightning/Bitcoin space are you most excited about?
reply
Personally I follow the changes in how education can be delivered at college/university level and how it can impact the life path of students and their contribution to society. I do not know yet how exactly it can be addressed with a specific technology, but education space in general has a lot of areas for improvement. I am also excited about Formula 1)
reply
Hi Oleg what are your thoughts on blockstream’s liquid sidechain? Would you fund a promising business building on liquid?
reply
Sidechains in general are an interesting concept to enhance bitcoin functionality without introducing changes on the base layers. If there would be real use cases for sidechains with significant adoption, it could also contribute to bitcoin security budget. We have not been following developments on sidechains originally, only recently we started to follow some projects trying out different sidechain concepts including liquid. In my point of view there are some key considerations about sidechains such as the implementation of peg, the consensus mechanism and the role of token (or absence of such) in fees and governance. But most importantly of course how these considerations support a specific use case. Liquid use case for tokenization of securities and settlement of securities trading is definitely interesting. Before funding a new technology area we try to understand it as much as we can and we are still learning about sidechains now.
reply
Are there different metrics that founders need to show to investors when raising money starting with a pre-seed round to a series A round? And are these metrics different for bitcoin focused VCs?
reply
Metrics can vary based on individual investor lenses but in general user engagement, monetisation and evidence of opportunity to scale may be a few metrics that highlight how sustainable is the enterprise and how much value it delivers and as well captures
It is a bit more difficult with bitcoin as there is a monetary system and internal economics that impact how value is produced, accumulated and distributed. And there are also metrics that are simply a derivative of the scale of adoption. And there may be new metrics fundamental to how bitcoin economy works (especially metrics related to the lightning network, but also onchain and mining) But in theory a startup should be able to produce metrics that resonate with both bitcoin and non-bitcoin VCs
Metrics are a means to making business decisions so they should be relevant for the dimension about which decision is being made
reply
Metrics for earlier rounds can be less formal and about the team performance in general, speed of learning and execution. Metrics for later rounds can be more about scaling and value
reply
What do you wish people were building that they aren't?
reply
I wish I knew, but if I knew i would pitch to someone and help them build. True convergence between decentralized finance and decentralized internet. True no-custodial P2P micropayments in applications with high frequency sub-dollar transactions. Replacement of login/password ecosystems with bitcoin keys derived authentication More consumer friendly home devices that actively participate in the network (meter readers, content distribution networks) I just can't imagine!
reply
how do you think the idea of replacing logins & passwords with bitcoin keys will be monetized?
will all consumer apps shift away from passwords?
reply
Personally I would pay for this because it solves a ton of logistic problems if done the right way, can improve personal data protection for an ordinary person and it can save a decent amount of time and mental overhead. Time and mental capacity are precious for almost everybody, I believe. So I imagine an app that charges a fixed fee or a subscription (with backup restore via multisig for example)
Replacement of authentication in all consumer apps is probably a huge challenge. Unless there is a way to recreate a new identity ecosystem that will overgrow MSFT/APPL/GOOG.
reply
I think one idea to grow the LN network is to bring lightning to existing products/industries where the lightning solves existing problems and is an enabling technology. Do you have thoughts on industries or markets where the lightning network is a good fit or where you see potential for new developments?
reply
Agree 100%. Incremental improvement in existing industries can be a very promising path for adoption, especially in industries that are more open for experimentation like gaming or have pressing problems like slow and inefficient payment settlement (utility bills). Digital content monetisation is also an attractive space for experimentation. Podcasts, music, streaming. We already have good examples of how lightning projects there improve economics of the participants in those markets. Cross-border settlment and P2P economies based on microtransactions are also potentially good areas to apply lightning.
Founders that come from such industries can have great insights about how to penetrate them.
reply
Hey Oleg!
Interested in hearing how you think about early stage Bitcoin start-ups. How do you evaluate new Bitcoin start-ups who might be pre-rev?
reply
Thank you for the question. Meeting new startups is mostly about meeting people - the team and founders and getting to know their drivers, motivations, strong sides and weak spots. Knowing the limits of own knowledge is a useful asset in the early stage. And pre-revenue ideally should not last long. So high speed of iteration and learning can be very helpful. And as we invest across the lightning ecosystem we also try to find synergies across teams and projects.
reply
bolt.fun started with a hackathon with <10 submissions and finished with >70 last month. How can we repeat their success? More activity of builders will lead to more economic activity of existing lightning projects (e.g. infrastructure service) but also deal flow for early-stage investors.
reply
Yes. I cannot commit on behalf of Bolt.Fun but I believe in what they are doing and they are doing a great job. We can create more awareness about what can be built and how to built and where to get support that all together is a unique opportunity for building on bitcoin. I wish next year every bitcoin tech conference runs an in real life track with submission on Bolt.Fun and year after next many non-bitcoin hackathons that attract talent have such tracks and integrate with bitcoin and lightning ecosystem
reply
Fulgur did a great job in supporting the bolt.fun community. Now the team proved what can be achieved with such a coordinated initiative. With support from other early-stage investors and lightning companies that can be replicated next year.
reply
Hi, I've been writing some Bitcoin/Lightning infrastructure at sovereign-stack.org. Might be of some interest to you.
reply
What are some of the misconceptions you have to clarify for these startup enthusiasts as they set up their BTC & Lightning enterprises? TIA!
reply
One of the most interesting areas to learn about is how to apply VC capital to grow the company, especially in an ecosystem like bitcoin that does not much rely on marketing to attract new users. It is not exactly a misconception but rather a black spot typically overlooked.
A misconception however might be that users will find the product themselves. This can rarely happen, mostly for very unique products with super strong wow, network effect and stickiness. Most products are not like this. But for example a P2P messenger with LN payments could be such.
Another misconception is that a valuation is very important to negotiate about, Valuation is rather a product (a consequence, derivative) of value to be created in partnership between VCs and founders. It can be more productive to talk about how to create value together, over a long term.
reply
Make a Bitcoin lightning porn site.
Free thumbnails Really cheap video previews Cheap video plays
Videos ranked by sats earned.
Donation pages for content creators Sats for comments like on stacker.news.
You can also copy this model with the business models of only fans and twitch.TV.
reply
But seriously, how has no one implemented this yet? Porn has been the innovation and adoption driver for the internet in general, how come porn hasn't yet arrived at Bitcoin??
reply
golden goose
reply
What are some of the red flags that otherwise prevent you from investing?
reply
we believe it is important to understand the technical design of the proposed solution and the engineering principles that it is built on to the extent it predefines the possible set of features. in addition understanding economic and social impact is important too
reply
Thanks Oleg to have supported us from the beginning :) <3
reply