As an aside, while this is an article with quite decent information, the Fortune writer seems to mix the concept of "MW" (capacity) and "MWh" (capacity and time), ... and throws in "KWh" even, for an additional measure of confusion.
It appears from the numbers given that the units they are actually referring to are MW, not mWh, and certainly not kHw.
As an aside, while this is an article with quite decent information, the Fortune writer seems to mix the concept of "MW" (capacity) and "MWh" (capacity and time), ... and throws in "KWh" even, for an additional measure of confusion.
It appears from the numbers given that the units they are actually referring to are MW, not mWh, and certainly not kHw.