pull down to refresh
21 sats \ 5 replies \ @siggy47 OP 5h \ parent \ on: New Territory Policy - A Futile & Stupid Gesture meta
So I guess zapping your reply is out of the question?
reply
Exactly
reply
Your territories do not look are doing that bad compared with others. In the past year, respectively at position:
You had great ideas when setting them up. More than
{zaprank} (that can be easily hacked) or {revenue}, i'd look at {engagement}.reply
Thanks. Seriously, for beginners I have rewarded top posts since early on. I'm trying to incentivize quality without attracting bad actors, as you point out. Honestly, I don't disagree with everything you wrote. That's why the award is modest. That coupled with SN's sybil fee, won't make it very easy to game, or worth the effort. I also reserve the right not to award anything, and to ignore the zaprank.
Also, do you think v for v has value?
reply
Yes, it definitely has, at least for me. Many things need to change for it to be adopted more widely. What needs to change is the perception of value we currently have, so much tight to material crap. Bitcoin is doing a great job already on changing people perception on the fiat value. Anyway...
Keep it up man, I know everyone here is doing the best that can and know to help SN. It's indeed an innovative idea, not new, but solved with a genuinely smart flavor.
reply