pull down to refresh

10 sats \ 6 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Sep \ on: Lutnick predicts 'better' job number accuracy after Trump fired BLS chief econ
The easiest way to be more accurate, as I understand their process, is to produce the numbers a little bit slower. It sounds like most of the corrections are due to surveys being returned late.
write
preview
52 sats \ 5 replies \ @Cje95 OP 5 Sep
Come onnnnnnn this has been my dream job I haved talked about here for over a year!!! All ya gotta do is throw a dart at a board and say its that number and then in 6 month completely revise it up or down 100s of thousands of jobs!!!!
If I get the job all bring you along with me and we can really have some fun here!
reply
10 sats \ 4 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Sep
I appreciate the offer and graciously accept.
reply
42 sats \ 3 replies \ @Cje95 OP 5 Sep
Whoop whoooop! I am thinking doing it South Park style with a chicken and a wheel? You have any ideas you would like to add?!
reply
20 sats \ 2 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Sep
Maybe one of those carnival strength contests where you smash a button with a giant hammer
reply
52 sats \ 1 reply \ @Cje95 OP 5 Sep
SOLD! Have to ring the bell to open and close any and all doors in the building! Keep the weak out!
reply
10 sats \ 0 replies \ @Undisciplined 5 Sep
We’re really onto something here. Run this idea up to Trump as an expansion of the Presidential Fitness Test to the civil service.
I’d say there’s a nonzero chance it ends up in an EO.
reply